My wife submitted the CF83 form (including a record of her PRSI contributions) and received back a letter from the HMRC with a NIC shortfall table for 2006/07 to 2023/24. However, 2006/07 to 2022/23 is at class 3, and 2023/24 is at class 2 and class 3 – total of £14.4k.
My wife was a stay at home carer from 2007 to 2023, when she started her own business.
My questions are:
Is the split between class 3 and class 2 on the shortfall table correct? My wife worked in the UK immediately before leaving, and previously lived in the UK for at least 3 years in a row and paid at least 3 years of contributions. Should the shortfall not all be at class 2?
Subsequent to receiving the HMRC letter, my wife was awarded home carer credited prsi contributions from 2007 to 2023. Would this be relevant to the HMRC – i.e. should 2007 to 2023 be class 2 instead of class 3 because of this?
Even if the original £14.4k is the correct figure – is it still worth paying this? My wife worked in the UK from 1998 to 2006.
Short answer:
If you believe it should be class 2, submit an appeal & documentation.
Even at class 3, you are getting a second state guaranteed pension, from age 67 for the rest of your life. Its not as sweet as Class2, but its still a very good deal.