That's not what he said.
I'm always curious about why people who object to something feel obligated to pontificate about how to do it better. You object to people striking and picketing, but you keep rabbiting on about how they can strike or picket better! Perhaps when you've had a few years at running strikes (as opposed to slagging them off), you might actually know something about how to improve them. This is the real hurler on the ditch (at the rugby match).
But then I heard (on the RTE wireless news) that if the entire CS / PS stayed at home for a day the saving in wages for the Minister for Hardship would be €60m
'temporary adjustments in the pay bill' is not the same as 'adjustments in pay'.Yes it is. They admitted there had to be temporary adjustments in the pay bill while working on reform. Hardly the 'we are not taking any more cuts' message that you say was the prime objective.
Is it crazy to think that perhaps you might want to participate in a strike or two, hang around a union for a while, walk up and down on a picket, attend a few union branch meetings BEFORE you appoint yourself the expert to decide 'how to do it properly'?Perhaps also you could point out where I said I objected to people striking and picketing? I don't agree with it but that's different. People have the right to strike and picket. Just wish they would do it properly if they feel so strongly about what they are striking about.
'temporary adjustments in the pay bill' is not the same as 'adjustments in pay'.
Is it crazy to think that perhaps you might want to participate in a strike or two, hang around a union for a while, walk up and down on a picket, attend a few union branch meetings BEFORE you appoint yourself the expert to decide 'how to do it properly'?
Good point; there's a huge face-saving exercise between them.'temporary adjustments in the pay bill' is not the same as 'adjustments in pay'.
Congratulations on your appointment as spokesperson for 'everyone else'. Best of luck in this challenging role.I am everyone else couldn't care less what you call it or how you do it as long as the savings are made.
Congratulations on your appointment as spokesperson for 'everyone else'. Best of luck in this challenging role.
Your feedback on approach to picketing will be given all the attention it deserves by the TU movement.
Me too, strangely enough.I'm everybody else....
I think this may be why there was some raised eye brows. It doesn't matter where the shopping happened, it was the fact that it appears quite a few went shopping when it is a strike.
Now there's nothing to say they can't, but someone must see how that looks? We're told about the huge support for the strike, how people are scared and fear what the government will do, their anger, etc and then some, a few, several, many, whatever, treat it as a day off and head off shopping.
Hospital services were cut back, gardai not issuing fixed penalty notices, benefits not paid etc and we "see" people who supposed to be on strike shopping.
Whether it was one or hundreds, I'm sure you can see why some may have an issue with the concept.
That's what was quoted on the lunch-time RTE wireless news. The reporter gave the Dept of Finance as the source with the proviso that to make the savings all PS / CS employees would need to be on strike. The spokesperson was unable to quantify the savings on Tuesday as some services were being delivered by staff working normal rotas.Is this a roughly accurate figure does anyone know?
Congratulations on your appointment as spokesperson for 'everyone else'. Best of luck in this challenging role.
Your feedback on approach to picketing will be given all the attention it deserves by the TU movement.
No, I don't. 'On Strike' means we were withdrawing our labour and losing a day's pay for withdrawing that labour. How we chose to organise picket duty and what we did when we were not picketing is our business.
There is no basis for their assumption that anyone who went to Newry didn't do their bit on the picket line before or after.Can you not see how they might feel some discontent if some of those who created the issue didn't protest, but went shopping instead?
I'm not judging those who did it, I'm asking if you can't understand why some people felt either anger or disbelief at the situation? If you really don't, then that's very blinkered.
Think of those services that directly affected individuals like health care and education, the areas that meant some had to use their own annual leave or possibly even unpaid leave to accomodate. Can you not see how they might feel some discontent if some of those who created the issue didn't protest, but went shopping instead?
Again, no judgement on the people who did so, but it isn't too much of an overstatement to say that they were very short-sighted if they didn't think there would be public reaction to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?