Kind of yeah…Run your thinking past us on this one… you say you’ve been investing 35-40k per year in a basket of individual stocks. Is this the “90k company shares” you listed in your assets? So add snother 12x 40k to that 90k and you get 570k, but before any growth?
Thanks for explaining, it does make sense. But with that info now, I would highly recommend getting your partner’s pension up and running to max out their tax relief at 20% and then drawdown on that ARF under income taxation rather than capital gains taxation…. Or rather a combination of both to minimise your tax bill.Make sense?
What's this? Contributory State Pension? Or something else?the CSP.
The problem with using her pension as a strategy is that it won’t be accessible until age 60 at a minimum due to scheme rules. So whatever we put into her pension pot will have to be removed from our “bridging” pot and thus increase our risk from age 50-60. Regardless of that I will still look into setting her pension up to give flexibility.Thanks for explaining, it does make sense. But with that info now, I would highly recommend getting your partner’s pension up and running to max out their tax relief at 20% and then drawdown on that ARF under income taxation rather than capital gains taxation…. Or rather a combination of both to minimise your tax bill.
Unfortunately not, I can only access DB and AVC pensions from age 60, hence the relatively large investment to stocks for bridging. As above, agree I should set her up with a pension income, thanks for pointing this out.Will you be able to access your own AVC’s via an ARF from age 50 while waiting for your DB pension from age 60? Again, better to have another income to use up tax credits rather than all CGT with minimal credits/allowances.
I understand. My pension assumes I will get CSP and the numbers I have been using are what the scheme will pay me net of that.Keep in mind the estimates you are working on for your DB pension might be a number that includes the CSP.
The problem with using her pension as a strategy is that it won’t be accessible until age 60 at a minimum due to scheme rules. So whatever we put into her pension pot will have to be removed from our “bridging” pot and thus increase our risk from age 50-60.
Good catch. I hadn’t thought of it that way.From earlier posts you seem to be talking about the period from when you are between 50 and 60. With a 5 year age gap, her pension, even if accessed at 60, would partly cover half of the bridging period.
Yes there is indeed. As it is a cost neutral adjustment I figured I’d roll that dice in order to increase the probability of success for the period 50-60. Bridging from 50-65 would be a stretch.Is there an actuarial reduction to your pension payout if you start to draw down at 60 as opposed to 65?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?