ScotlandI was in school for all of the 70s and was taught by the Marist brothers. I never once heard of any suggestion of any abuse
I don't get you point. Is it that we should exclude people from teaching who heap physical and emotional abuse on children? If that's the question then yes, we should.Some of the lay teachers by comparison were sadistic in their treatment of pupils, in terms of the physical and emotional abuse they heaped on vulnerable children. Should we also exclude this cohort as well in the future?
I presume it wasn't Newbridge or Castleknock so.I went to a boarding school in the 80's, run and taught by priests and to the best of my knowledge, there was never an issue.
All reports of sexual abuse had to be reported to the Vatican. They then decided whether or not the civil authorities were informed. This was handled by the Office of the Doctrine of the Faith, run by the then Cardinal Ratzinger, who was the final arbiter. In effect Irish citizens were instructed to give Papal Law primacy over Irish Law. The same was true of all priests worldwide. Some Irish bishops were very angry about that but were forced into line. The disgusting and shameful letter from the Pope blaming failings within the Irish Church for the abuse that happened here must have been particularly hard to read from the Pulpit but in the end they all had to toe the Vatican line.What it did do for me was to allow me to see priests as human beings, some were fantastic and I would have the utmost time and respect for them, and some were totally eejits and gobdaws but I could have said the same about lay teachers as well. I well remember a lay female teacher in primary school who put more than one child in A&E and whose favourite punishment was to literally bang kids heads together or off the desk.
What was interesting, looking back, was that the boarding school was run by the diocese and staffed by diocesian priests, as opposed to an order of priests. From talking to a couple of people who work for the church, they've said that the bishops had and have virtually no control over these orders and the likes of the Jesuits, Spiritans etc were almost like their own "country" within the broader church. I detect a certain arrogance amongst the leaders of those orders.
Incidentally, I'm not saying the diocese was perfect, I grew up in Cloyne diocese so know well what happened there and knew one of the priests mentioned in that report and he was someone we all were told to avoid. I also know of one group of Dads who metted out their own justice to the lay principle of a Christian Brothers school after the Gardai refused to take any action and a senior Garda almost threw then out of the station.
I have a perception, rightly or wrongly, that the orders, especially those led from overseas, were more "out of control" then those local. What is really scary is that it was very easy for those orders to send a priest out in the missions and I dread to think what happened in some cases as a result.
My point was that it wasn’t evident in the school I attended. Some of the lay teachers by comparison should have been imprisoned.Scotland
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-13-marist-brothers (Australia)
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/129463095/the-shocking-scale-and-impact-of-decades-of-abuse-by-multiple-marist-brothers-and-fathers (New Zealand)
Ireland
USA
Australia stands out though.
I went to a Christian Brothers school in the 80's but they were all gone (retired/dead/hidden/locked up) by the time I was in second year. I was an ugly child anyway so I was safe enough.My point was that it wasn’t evident in the school I attended. Some of the lay teachers by comparison should have been imprisoned.
Ah good. So they reported him to a higher authority.his colleagues didn't cover up for him and lie about it.
I won't get into that here.Ah good. So they reported him to a higher authority.
How did that go?
No, that's of no consequence in real life discussions.What’s your next question? Do I believe in Satan?
I certainly hope so.My view is that children generally were very exposed to abuse in all corners of society and that it wasn’t confined to religious orders.
We live in much more enlightened times where reports of abuse are taken much more seriously. I’d like to think that children attending school these days are no longer exposed to any form of abuse.
To me the issue is that there have been plenty of apologies but I find it impossible to believe that the religious orders and RC Church in general were not already aware of the current accusations. If their apologies were sincere then they would have proactively disclosed that information to the Gardaí years ago. Given that I conclude that they are only sorry that they were caught. Therefore they have no place having any role in the education of children.I don’t know whether the current apologies and commitments to restorative justice will prove to be sincere. I certainly hope so.
Does that in any way mitigate the abuse?Most of the students who were educated by the spiritans seemed to have a very positive experience.
Have they said that?The past pupils union (the ones who actually went there and saw things first hand rather than the ones who just read the paper) clearly don’t think it’s worth pulling the plug on the entire arrangement.
Of course not but it shows they have the capacity to provide good education and that they don’t exist solely for the purpose of facilitating child abusers.Does that in any way mitigate the abuse?
Nobody claimed otherwise but they knew about the accusations and didn't alert the Gardaí or make them public so that others might come forward. That tells me that protecting their institution was more important to them than protecting the children in their care. That tells me that their institutions are rotten and should not be involved in the education of children. The individual teachers can of course continue to teach but the schools shouldn't be run by institutions whose first loyalty is to a foreign country.Of course not but it shows they have the capacity to provide good education and that they don’t exist solely for the purpose of facilitating child abusers.
It's hardly surprising that people didn't talk about it.I have over the past twenty years run into many past pupils of Michaels and more than a few times the subject of clerical abuse would be raised and never once have I heard anything untoward about the priests until last week, quite amazing and shocking at the same time that it has remained hidden or obscured till now
To be totally honest, and not trying to be dramatic here, I read some reports in the Examiner this morning, and it has really upset me. The fact that this was facilitated by men of the cloth is just despicable. On so many levels, this was just so, so wrong, and I hope that those who suffered get the just rewards.Was anyone actually surprised at the scale of the abuse reported yesterday?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?