Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,687
The Minister's reply to the Seanad Debate on the AE bill yesterday was a verbatim repeat (read from script) of her reply to the Dail. Until she added this gem. She recalled the huge success of the SSIA but observed that after the 5 years of that initiative ended the equity based SSIAs had underperformed the deposit versions.
I nearly choked on my evening cocktail giving the duchess an instant cause for alarm.
For heaven's sake the DSP proposal is for the default investment strategy to be in equities until age 51.
The SSIA experience actually underpins Colm's proposal. If equities always outperformed deposits there would be no need for his smoothing approach.
Of course, this little gem did not occur to the Minister over her cornflakes. But I refuse to believe that it came from the PC which has enough actuaries to know better.
No, this nonsensical comparison came from her department who have clearly adopted a bunker mentality in defending the indefensible on several fronts. The problem with that is that a GE induced change in our political masters will not penetrate this bunker.
I nearly choked on my evening cocktail giving the duchess an instant cause for alarm.
For heaven's sake the DSP proposal is for the default investment strategy to be in equities until age 51.
The SSIA experience actually underpins Colm's proposal. If equities always outperformed deposits there would be no need for his smoothing approach.
Of course, this little gem did not occur to the Minister over her cornflakes. But I refuse to believe that it came from the PC which has enough actuaries to know better.
No, this nonsensical comparison came from her department who have clearly adopted a bunker mentality in defending the indefensible on several fronts. The problem with that is that a GE induced change in our political masters will not penetrate this bunker.