J
facetious - I'm unsure why you state that the OP broke any agreement when the agreement stated that the Op could assign the lease -which is exactly what Op tried to do with three seperate parties.
It seems to me that the landlord broke the agreement/contract -assuming,of course, that the OP had reasonable tenants to take over the lease.
Sadly for OP it is a laborious process -with PRTB it can take ages, but it wouldn't be much quicker with a solicitor who'll charge .
As a landlord myself people like this landlord really annoy me as they perpetuate the bad rep that landlords have.
186.—(1) This section has effect—
(a) despite the fact that the tenancy concerned is one for a fixed period, and
(b) despite anything to the contrary in the lease or tenancy agreement concerned.
(2) If a landlord of a dwelling refuses his or her consent to an assignment or sub-letting of the tenancy concerned by the tenant, the tenant may serve a notice of termination in respect of the tenancy and terminate it accordingly.
(3) The period of notice to be given by that notice of termination is—
(a) that specified in section 66 , or
(b) such lesser period of notice as may be agreed between the landlord and the tenant in accordance with section 69 ,
even if the lease or tenancy agreement provides for a greater period of notice to be given.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?