Hi,
I`m leaving the apartment I was renting for the last 3 years at the end of the month.
During my three years there, the waching machine broke 4 times.
The first time it stopped working,I rang the landlady to ask her what should I do, and she told me to ring the service number in the instruction booklet for the washing machine, and arrange for someone to come and fix it.
So I did that, and paid myself, meaning to ask the landlady for the money
back at a later stage.
Three other times the washing machine broke, and since I knew the procedure, I didnt bother the landlady by ringing her - I just rang the service center directly, arranged for them to come, and paid them when they fixed it. I mentioned the incidents to her in general conversations afterwards.
Now that I am leaving the apartment, I have shown the landlady the receipts for this work done, and have asked her to pay me back (Its E210 for the 4 visits).
She is saying that the breakages were caused through ¨general use¨ and so I should pay for fixing the machine.
Is this fair?
I dont think it is, since in one of the breakages, it was because the inlet tube was too short, so with the movement of the machine it was stretched and water starting leaking out. So the service guy replaced it by a tube three times longer. Another time the motor (I think) had to be replaced. The previous apartment I lived in for 2 years had the same waching machine, and I had no problems with it, so I dont think its that i am specially hard on waching machines! (The service man said its like a new machine now, since it has the new motor and tube).
My contract is not very specific. It says the landlady is responsible for the upkeep of appliances, apart from where its degradation due to general use. I suppose here we are disagreeing whether the breakages are through general use, or faults with the original machine/installation.
Apart from this, I get on ok with the landlady and have been a model tennant (never late on a payment, place kept spotless, etc).
What do you think - is she right to not pay me back for these repairs?
I wouldnt even mind going half and half.
Thanks,
Shiraz.
I`m leaving the apartment I was renting for the last 3 years at the end of the month.
During my three years there, the waching machine broke 4 times.
The first time it stopped working,I rang the landlady to ask her what should I do, and she told me to ring the service number in the instruction booklet for the washing machine, and arrange for someone to come and fix it.
So I did that, and paid myself, meaning to ask the landlady for the money
back at a later stage.
Three other times the washing machine broke, and since I knew the procedure, I didnt bother the landlady by ringing her - I just rang the service center directly, arranged for them to come, and paid them when they fixed it. I mentioned the incidents to her in general conversations afterwards.
Now that I am leaving the apartment, I have shown the landlady the receipts for this work done, and have asked her to pay me back (Its E210 for the 4 visits).
She is saying that the breakages were caused through ¨general use¨ and so I should pay for fixing the machine.
Is this fair?
I dont think it is, since in one of the breakages, it was because the inlet tube was too short, so with the movement of the machine it was stretched and water starting leaking out. So the service guy replaced it by a tube three times longer. Another time the motor (I think) had to be replaced. The previous apartment I lived in for 2 years had the same waching machine, and I had no problems with it, so I dont think its that i am specially hard on waching machines! (The service man said its like a new machine now, since it has the new motor and tube).
My contract is not very specific. It says the landlady is responsible for the upkeep of appliances, apart from where its degradation due to general use. I suppose here we are disagreeing whether the breakages are through general use, or faults with the original machine/installation.
Apart from this, I get on ok with the landlady and have been a model tennant (never late on a payment, place kept spotless, etc).
What do you think - is she right to not pay me back for these repairs?
I wouldnt even mind going half and half.
Thanks,
Shiraz.