Lack of trains and lack of catering on trains.

- its clear there arent huge populations involved here. However, there are still significant polulations and the people of this region deserve to have infrastructural access like the rest of the country has and benefit economically from it.
You're missing the obvious point that rail services only work properly when there is a sufficient population base to support them.

I have family in two separate counties of the South East each with rail services and in both locations the trains are handy to have but are underutilised because there's barely enough of a population locally to support the sort of frequent services that people need.
 
The point re needing a population to support it is understood. My point is that arguably there is a sufficient population along a dublin to NW route to support it in as much as there is for other routes.

My other related point is that its needed by the people of the region and would be very beneficial to the region.
 
My point is that arguably there is a sufficient population along a dublin to NW route to support it in as much as there is for other routes
There clearly isn't. The relative lack of road infrastructure in that route is an obvious clue of that, as also is the relative lack of retail and social infrastructure.

How many Penneys/Primarks are there in that region for example?
 
The lack of roads proves there should be no roads?
No, the lack of roads is an indicator of relatively low population - especially in a country which has experienced a considerable expansion of its road network in recent decades.

This isn't remotely complicated.
 
No, the lack of roads is an indicator of relatively low population - especially in a country which has experienced a considerable expansion of its road network in recent decades.
Hilarious, that's some logic! The lack of roads is simply an indicator that politicians in Donegal are not in the same league as the Healy Raes.
 
Hilarious, that's some logic! The lack of roads is simply an indicator that politicians in Donegal are not in the same league as the Healy Raes.
And the topography, population spread, legacy of historical investment, proximity to other population centres etc.
I'm not disagreeing with you but there's more to it than that.
 
Ok then. I see Kerry has twice the length of dual carriageways as Donegal. I suppose the population of Kerry is double that of Donegal?
Kerry is surrounded by two counties with relatively high population density and is proximate to two of the country's largest cities.

Donegal is the opposite.

A population density map illustrates the stark difference between the two.
 
topography, population spread, legacy of historical investment, proximity to other population centres etc.
I'm not disagreeing with you but there's more to it than that.
Similar topography, similar population, Donegal closer to it's nearest city. It seems the main difference is historical investment.
 
There was a rail link between where I'm from and where I went to college for a number of years. Now, I never took that train because the times were not convenient, the bus was cheaper and saved a considerable walk. The presence of a train didn't stop me leaving that area as soon as I graduated, grads chase jobs, most of those aren't in the likes of Sligo.
 
Similar topography, similar population, Donegal closer to it's nearest city.
What, Derry? It's a poor town in a different country with a population of 80,000 or so.
It seems the main difference is historical investment.
Yea, for 40 years the lunatics in the IRA made sure that most of the border crossings were closed and the only connection to the rest of this country was a small sliver where it met Sligo. Now the same clowns are complaining about lack of investment and infrastructure without acknowledging that they are largely to blame.