Wrong order, this is part of the reason why the issues persists.
The committee element is part of the democratic process.We'll maybe the 50 days of committee deciding on it, and adding in layers of excessively complicated administrative procedure
Its an analogy, when people start adding "nice to have" (depending on point of view) items to a simple project.No idea what mammoths have to do with it.
Case in pointLook at the Arts council project. That's what this leads to. I wonder how many meetings they had on that one.
Not in my experience. I find it better to remove unnecessary processes and tasks before the rest is standardised. Then the processes which can be automated are identified but it's more of a gant chart than a linear process.Wrong order, this is part of the reason why the issues persists.
Correct order is standardize, streamline then automate if possible.
Absolutely; buy an off the shelf package, for HR, Wages, etc, and then adjust your practices and processes to work within that package. That's what organisations which are open to real competition do.Biggest problem is bespoke systems.
Hideously expensive in the long run but loved by tech companies as they have you for ever with tech support and upgrades.
Poor Brendan, I thought he was retired and minding his own business!Brendan Howlin is always entertaining even though he can be a bit left of centre for my taste.
It would be nice if the healthcare sector did actually concentrate more on healthcare instead of sick care; prevention rather than cure.The obvious thing that you never hear lefties say is that people just need to stop getting sick.
The ones I hear of are all on 35-year leases.With obvious massive overcapacity due to blended working that rent bill should be trending towards zero over the next 5-10 years
Wow.It varies by Department and office in fairness but the one I'm working in accommodates people from 3 different departments and is rarely at even 50% capacity.
That's shocking.The Civil Service alone spends well over €100 million on office rental every year (owned offices is about the same capacity). The rest of the public sector is probably st least as much. With obvious massive overcapacity due to blended working that rent bill should be trending towards zero over the next 5-10 years. But I'm not optimistic- too many political interests in artificially supporting the so-called private sector throughthese support payments disguised as rents to actually do this. Never mind the giant waste of cash and potential to free office space for conversion to desoerately needed housing . ..
But if they were to get serious about reducing office space due to only 50% capacity then that means shared desks, there probably be a hissy fit about that , hygiene OTT and the rest , they probably want a deep clean after every work day, of course provided by a private sector contractor working unsociable hours to fulfill ?The rest of the public sector is probably st least as much. With obvious massive overcapacity due to blended working that rent bill should be trending towards zero over the next 5-10 years.
I would have to disagree here.I find it better to remove unnecessary processes and tasks before the rest is standardized
And people say they want more and bigger government.
Slight correction needed.
People want more and more services provided
And people say they want more and bigger government.
A LEAN programme would never impose a top down solution. It asks simple questions, maps processes (real processes, what the theory states is irrelevant), removed unnecessary and non value added processes, reduces or reallocates headcount and then automates where desirable.I would have to disagree here.
In a large organisation you will have "team norms".
This can be a problem for many reasons.
There is a concept called "work as imagined vs work as done."
Most managers are in the first category while many workers are in the latter.
You cannot fix/improve things if both parties have a totally different view point as to what is actually been done and how to actually do it in practice.
Often "imposed solutions" (top down) fail simply because the relevant authority (Government/Manager/Supervisor) hadn't a clue and was following the MBA playbook.
I don't. I want the State to do the least possible for me as I can do many things better and cheaper for myself.Slight correction needed.
People want more and more services provided, while expecting the magic money tree to cover the cost.
RoadsI don't. I want the State to do the least possible for me as I can do many things better and cheaper for myself
Correct.Roads
An Garda
Hospitals
Schools
Etc
All are services provided by the state.
Roads
An Garda
Hospitals
Schools
Etc
All are services provided by the state.
+1Correct.
What's your point?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?