Sister Sara
Registered User
- Messages
- 74
No you weren't. You didn't mention that until I said it.I wasn't talking about Arab countries, I was talking about Iran which is a Persian country.
The facts, their support of murderous terrorists who run Gaza, their destabilisation of Lebanon and their support for jihadist terrorists around the world, tell a different story.I'm not doubting it, but so is 'No Surrender', 'Tiocfaidh ár lá' etc....but in the real politik of the world, diplomatic relations tend to involve more complex and intricate relations based on reality. I do not believe that Iranian diplomats would seek negotiation with US or Israeli counterparts with the rabble rousing rhetoric?
Just my opinion.
That's not clear at all. What is true is that the IAEA weren't at all happy with Iranian cooperation during the previous deal.True, but to my knowledge, it was highly enriched after Trump tore up the previous agreement.
I agree.As you mention later, countries have interests - from an Iranian perspective, after what Trump did, I'd imagine it was now in their interest to develop capability of obtaining a nuclear weapon.
That's also not clear, Netanyahu notwithstanding.They were however nowhere close to do so contrary to psycho-babble of the deranged Netanyahu for the last 30yrs or so.
No, they've killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Do you really think that's not as bad as something which might have happened?Yes really. Notwithstanding the other horrendous conflicts you have mentioned, none of them have come close to attacking nuclear facilities and the devastating impact that may occur from radiation leakage.
International law was the imposition of Western liberal values on the world by a dominant USA after the Second World War. That period is now over. For those who think that it a good thing I'd suggest that you should be careful what you wish for. For all it's faults I'll take a dominant America over a dominant China or Russia or India any day of the week and twice on Sunday.International law and an international order is, to my mind, on the floor when Western allies (US, EU, UK) will rightly impose sanction against Russia and other warring tribes and states but effectively ignore the continued occupation, apartheid and genocidal attempt of the Israeli regime.
No you weren't. You didn't mention that until I said it.
The facts, their support of murderous terrorists who run Gaza, their destabilisation of Lebanon and their support for jihadist terrorists around the world, tell a different story.
That's also not clear, Netanyahu notwithstanding.
No, they've killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Do you really think that's not as bad as something which might have happened?
International law was the imposition of Western liberal values on the world by a dominant USA after the Second World War. That period is now over. For those who think that it a good thing I'd suggest that you should be careful what you wish for. For all it's faults I'll take a dominant America over a dominant China or Russia or India any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Okay, well that's incorrect as well. The USA have a much larger Jewish population.?Sorry I don't get you? I said that outside of Israel, Iran has the second highest Jewish population who are free to practice their religion without fear of anti-semitism.
Zionism is the belief that Israel has the right to exist so in that sense I agree; Iran have a problem with the existence of Israel and think it should be wiped off the map. If they don't think so then they should say so.My point being, that Iran's stated vow to wipe Israel off the face of the earth has nothing to do with Judaism. It must be something else? I would suggest that it has to do with Zionism, which I can only conclude now is the project of fascist and autocratic zealots who have debased the religion of Judaism.
Yep, both sides, at least both ruling groups, believe that they have a mandate from heaven to wipe out the other side.The same can be said of Israel and US. Israel, supported by Netenyahu, once funded Hamas to cause a split in the Palestinian Liberation movement. This is widely documented. Israeli 'militia's' in Lebanon act as a buffer to hold illegally occupied territory. The US has been financing both sides of any number of conflicts since God knows when.
I agree. I totally get the condemnation of the actions of the Israeli government but I don't get the support for the government of Gaza, Hamas, by so many people. Hamas are a suicide cult that are more than happy to see every child in Gaza die on the alter of their fetishized religious mania.I'd rather not go down the road of whataboutery, there are no innocents protaganists in this whole affair, not in military or government anyway. Only civilian innocents.
How is that clearly now a lie? I don't think the case was made for the attack, not by any stretch, but I don't think you can say it is clearly now a lie.This thread is the Israel's war on Iran that commenced on 13 June 2025. It was started under the false pretence of WMD being within days/weeks/months of being obtained by Iran. Clearly that is now a lie, and hundreds of innocent civilians are needlessly dead.
Probably, not not certainly.Exactly. If it was not clear, at best, and all the intellegience both indepenent and US indicated that Iran was not near obtaining nuclear weapons then Israels attack on Iran was wholly wreckless, and criminal in my opinion.
I'd say the Arab Spring and the resulting Syrian Civil War was far more destabilising.My point is that what Israel is doing in Palestine and its recent aggressive criminal attacks on Iran have, to my mind, been the most de-stablising factor for the region, and further afield. As your next point demonstrates.
It is the loss of US dominance that has, to a great extent, caused it to behave in this manner.International law was the imposition of Western liberal values on the world and that period is now most certainly over. Trampled on by a (too) dominant USA that imposes sanctions on International Prosecutors for issuing arrest warrants against wanted war criminals.
It's always been selective, as has every country and every empire and every law forever.I would take a dominant US over China or Russia et al any day of the week too - but not without condition. Not at any price. It would have to be on the principle of Western values being upheld internationally and not selectively.
Up until 10-15 years ago we had a period of decades with a very stable world with very few wars.The US in my opinion has become too dominant. It is untouchable, unaccountable, and the consequences are there for everyone to see with never-ending wars terrorising local civilian populations without any semblence of end-game.
No, it's a democratic system. That's what's keeping the extremists in check. It's also worth remembering that the US on its worst day, even under the current administration, is better than China or Russia on their best day.The warmongers are in control, it is a fascist autocratic system.
Give it time. We'll probably vote in the Shinners the next time. They are our populists with a history of murder and subversion of democracy. Anyone who votes for them has no business complaining about Trump.The only saving grace from my perspective is its not Europe that is being torn to shreds this time.
Okay, well that's incorrect as well. The USA have a much larger Jewish population.
How is that clearly now a lie? I don't think the case was made for the attack, not by any stretch, but I don't think you can say it is clearly now a lie.
It is the loss of US dominance that has, to a great extent, caused it to behave in this manner.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?