galway_blow_in
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,102
My wife didn’t feel threatened but was deeply insultedAgree, for something to be defamatory, it must be said to or heard by someone other than the person being defamed.
If they felt threatened, then they should go to the Gardaí and it might prevent it happening again.
Brendan
I would not be in favour of her going to a solicitor, as you say above, you have to prove something is untrue , presumably saying someone is “ disgusting or has no decency “ is very different to accusing someone of stealing? , how does one prove they aren’t disgusting or that they have decency?She would have to prove it was untrue and it lowered her reputation in the eyes of the common man.
I suspect that she has better things to do. The courts certainly have.
Brendan
since there is no factual allegation here, just my "honest" opinion of his character.@Brendan Burgess is disgusting the way he carries on on this website
because reasonable people could differ on how appalling that was, and how damaging such a revelation would be.Brendan passes on AAM users' personal information to the Revenue commissioners
unless I was a journalist and had reasonable grounds to believe this might be true (since it would certainly be in the public interest).Brendan sells AAM users' personal information to third-world investment scammers in England
My wife isn’t going to pursue this , I was just trying to develop my understanding of the whole area of defamationStatements of honest opinion are generally not defamatory: there would have to be a factual allegation, communicated to others, that damages your reputation. See https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/justice/civil_law/law_on_defamation.html
Some examples. I can "safely" say
since there is no factual allegiation here, just my "honest" opinion of his character.
It might be defamatory if I said
because reasonable people could differ on how appalling that was, and how damaging such a revelation would be.
Whereas it would almost certainly be defamatory if I said
unless I was a journalist and had reasonable grounds to believe this might be true (since it would certainly be in the public interest).
Even if a court finds something defamatory, there is the matter of damages.
I doubt the Guards or DPP would be interesting in pursuing a case based on what you've posted (assuming the shotgun is metaphorical!), but (as others have suggested above) a community Guard could pop around for a friendly chat to educate them about the law. Although equally, a visit from the Guards could provoke an escalation if they have a persecution complex.It is an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour in a public place with the intention of breaching the peace.
I'm pretty sure the burden of proof is on the person who made the objectionable statement or claim.She would have to prove it was untrue and it lowered her reputation in the eyes of the common man.
Yes, the statement is assumed to be false unless the person can prove it was true. But I think the victim would have to prove that it actually damaged them.I'm pretty sure the burden of proof is on the person who made the objectionable statement or claim.
Yes, the statement is assumed to be false unless the person can prove it was true. But I think the victim would have to prove that it actually damaged them.
How do you prove someone is disgusting or has No decency?Yes, the statement is assumed to be false unless the person can prove it was true. But I think the victim would have to prove that it actually damaged them.
I suspect that was a myth. I've never even heard it said that an actual human being said something like that to anyone else. And the area I grew up in was very conservative.Back in the day, if someone admitted to engaging regularly in intimate activity pre-marriage, the local holy Joe, could in the presence of others say:
"you've no decency, what you're doing is disgusting, you should be ashamed of yourself, etc. etc."
They'll put you in jail now in Indonesia if you did any of the above.Back in the day, if someone admitted to engaging regularly in intimate activity pre-marriage, the local holy Joe, could in the presence of others say:
"you've no decency, what you're doing is disgusting, you should be ashamed of yourself, etc. etc."
Is/Was this defamation?!
Would it matter if the intimate activity was of a homo rather than hetero nature?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?