[I replied earlier but my response doesn't seem to have shown up - apologies if it comes through twice].
I was driving from City Centre (dublin) down Townsend St, which itself is one-way. I had done nothing illegal at that point.
I turned right, into a NO-ENTRY ie. a ONE-WAY that EXITS onto Townsend St. This was the offense, I know that was wrong.
Personally I'm with you EFM, surely I am not guilty of the offence as accused. However I would have thought they cannot adjust the wording on the spot and say 'ok now you're guilty'. Presumably I should stick to my guns that I didn't do as accused and NOT say 'but this is what I did' or I am guilty by admission?
I would have thought that a court-hearing is designed to hear pleads of guilty or not. The point is that unless I'm missing something major in the wording about I am not-guilty of the offence as stated and should not plead/be found guilty to an offence I didn't commit.