They didn't AFAIK, so that's not helping much.Heres my shot at goal...we know that some do and most dont include it, we know that the Institute of Taxation say, Revenus issued a briefing on it (I think)
Has anyone that included it as a deductable expense, and was subsequently audited (for general compliance), told by Revenue that it was not deductable, and had to pay outstanding taxes/interest/penalties arrising?
As far as I'm concerned the Revenue have stated that it does not qualify as a deductible expense.
.
What is "private correspondence"?
Are these letters from the Revenue stating that LPT is NOT a deductible expence.?
If so that is quite dramatic news and surelya precursor to an official announcement.
Or did I misunderstand Joe90/TMcG posts?
I fear that Revenue may be adopting the same interpretation of what is deductible as they did with NPPR. Because the relevant act allows for the deduction of rates levied by local authorities Revenue claimed that NPPR was not allowable as it was not levied by local authorities but by central govnt.
Revenue are probably making the same claim about the LPT and are disregarding the fact that local authorities can periodically adjust it by a small margin . That is, such adjustments by local authorities do not mean that they are actually"levying" this tax.
Every LL I know believes this LPT deductible ("Mr Noonan said it would be ").
Are they in for a shock ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?