Receivers claiming the right to receive rent from the tenant with none of the obligations that go with it (such as to make repairs) seems unlawful.
.
Actually here's a thought, why doesn't Threshold lobby banks/receivers to make it a policy that receivers will act as a landlord should. That's the right thing to do after all.
Reveivers would not get away with this in the USA.
Bronte, it's definitely a mess, but are you sure its 'not unlawful'?
Has this ever been tested in court?
.
Nobody is sure yet how lawful it is as as far as I know it's not been tested.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?