Ireland is the second most expensive country in the Eurozone for food and alcohol, with consumers paying significantly more for items like milk and bread compared to the EU average, the Central Statistics Office (CSO) has said.
...
Irish consumers pay 12% more for food than the EU average, while alcohol prices are nearly double the European average.
Not nitpicking, but it's also worth remembering though that the Euro came into being on 1 January 1999, although it was 3 years later when coins and banknotes replaced their Irish pound equivalent.it was after euro came in 2002 that everything went craz
Yes, I would also argue that manipulating our tax code to allow multinationals to move their IP here and all the corporation tax to flow in has also not been healthy. It has been grossly inflationary and allowed the state to act like drunken sailors. The moribund state architecture is not able to cope with such large revenue inflows. Ultimately I think it will be proven to be folly aswell.remember the ESRI economist Terry Baker arguing that a tax mortgages might have worked as a response but that came to nothing sadly.
It was all a terrible folly that culminated in disaster post 2008 and it's eminently arguable that Ireland hasn't been fully right since.
I didn't write the article. You might want to contact the Indo or the CSO if you have issues with the data and analysis.@ClubMan, from the linked article it looks like those are gross figures and not adjusted for purchasing power.
I didn't say you did. I was just pointing out how TheI didn't write the article. You might want to contact the Indo or the CSO if you have issues with the data and analysis.
They're just using the data from the CSO.I was just pointing out how TheCorkExaminer was, as usual, misrepresenting the data in order to be sensationalist.
The article compares prices in the eurozone. I'm not sure that purchasing power has any relevance in this context.. . . from the linked article it looks like those are gross figures and not adjusted for purchasing power.
Yep, and they should, as a newspaper, present the information in context.They're just using the data from the CSO.
Hopefully as solid as their resistance to fracking, and the energy savings it offers.SF with some more solid numbers this time:
The only Green energy source that is a viable alternative to hydrocarbons is nuclear.Surely the renewable sector should be charged with the cost when they cannot provide power 24 hours, 7 days a week. Currently they reap all the benefits but non of the costs .
20 countries with 90% or more of their electricity supplied by non-nuclear & non-fossil fuel energy sources would disagree with that utterly uninformed statement.The only Green energy source that is a viable alternative to hydrocarbons is nuclear.
It depends what day you read the Indo.
Today I am reading an article, the headline says something totally different...
"Record numbers in arrears on energy bills as families ‘forced to prioritise buying groceries"
Let's have a chat with them in DecemberMy solar panels would also like a quick word.
Keep paying those electricity bills if you believe solar panels don't work in winter. It won't cost me anything- my electricity supplier knows better, primarily because I haven't given them any money since I switched to them well over a year ago and I've already got several hundred euro credit built up to get me through next winter!Let's have a chat with them in December
Don't you have to pay a standing charge?because I haven't given them any money since I switched to them well over a year ago
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?