Purple;
Of course in a graph higher earners pay most of tax take, in that the lower earners need to get to a living wage before they pay anything.
That graph for me shows a steady increase as you earn more ;
Maybe a graph starting after a nominal living wage , would give more clarity on whether those that pay the most are being hard done by on straight income related tax measures?
Visually that graph shows a steady increase as you earn more , so it looks to be a fairish system?
...........The Graph is far too steep. The marginal rate of income taxes should never be above 50% and people on the average industrial wage shouldn't be on the highest rate of income tax.
If the same increases were spread out over incomes between €0 and €200'000it would be approaching fair.
...........
Same increases spread from 0 to 200,000 would not be fair.
eg Well off use roads for their car , less well off do not have a car , why should poorer pay for better off,s roads?
Hi Joe,
Same percentages but with the income levels stretched out to €200'000
Under the current rates the % is
10k 0%
20k 11%
30k 18%
40k 24.83%
50k 30.26%
60k 33.89%
80k 38.41%
100k 41.13%
Are you proposing that
20k 0%
40k 11%
60k 18%
80k 24.83%
100k 30.26%
Remembering some maths from over 50 years ago, would the area under the graph in some way represent the total tax take?
Remembering some maths from over 50 years ago, would the area under the graph in some way represent the total tax take?