IMF's comments on the mortgage crisis

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
52,149
From the issued in March 2013


Box 3. Mortgage Arrears Resolution Preparations (PDF page 19)
Initial steps in dealing with mortgage arrears emphasized consumer protection including protections of the family home.
The Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA), introduced by the CBI in 2009 and strengthened in 2010, requires banks to establish a structured Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process for engaging with struggling borrowers, through a specialized Arrears Support Unit. There is a 12-month moratorium on repossession so long as the borrower cooperates with the lender, limits on contacts with borrowers to avoid harassment, and lenders must not require borrowers in arrears to give up their low cost tracker mortgage. At the same time, borrowers must disclose their financial position through a Standard Financial Statement.

However, it was soon recognized that forbearance would in many cases not provide a sustainable solution.
The September 2011 Keane report recommended a case-by-case approach, with banks applying a decision tree in each case to determine the appropriate resolution option, which may include a split mortgage—where part of the mortgage is serviced and the remainder is warehoused. It also recognized that some people will lo
se their homes, and supported earlier recommendations (including the November 2010 report of the Mortgage Arrears and Personal Debt Group) for reform of judicial bankruptcy proceedings and the establishment of a non-judicial debt settlement process.

In late 2011, the CBI intensified its supervisory oversight in this area, to ensure banks have the operational capacity and strategies to address mortgage arrears bilaterally.
In early 2012, a Distressed Credit Operations Review identified deficiencies in the resources and skills of banks in this area, and the CBI has monitored improvements by banks. Banks also developed strategies for treatments of borrowers according to their circumstances, where there is a decision between temporary forbearance, longer-term modifications, and solutions involving change of ownership. The CBI has reviewed these strategies and they have been piloted during the second half of 2012.
19. A range of factors have hindered durable resolution, but the authorities recognize that there is a need to address unsustainable debts to avoid further delaying the domestic economic recovery.

As is typical in a crisis, banks delay loan resolution in the hope of more favorable economic and property market conditions. In the meantime, the application of IRFS incurred loss model has facilitated banks recognizing their loan losses at a slower pace than under other accounting regimes. It has also taken time to strengthen inadequate operational capacity to deal with distressed assets, and banks experience difficulties engaging with some borrowers, in part reflecting protections under the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA). Personal insolvency reforms that were recently completed had earlier posed uncertainties for banks about appropriate resolution strategies; more recently, with these reforms nearing implementation, a group of banks has adopted a multilender coordination protocol which could help resolve arrears cases without deploying the personal insolvency framework. Finally, there are also concerns that loan modifications entailing principal reductions could stimulate strategic defaults, with such concerns heightened by impediments to initiating repossession proceedings.

20. Accordingly, the authorities are committed to wide-ranging actions to ensure decisive progress in resolving distressed assets in 2013 Targets for durable loan restructuring are supported by steps across consumer protection arrangements, reforms of repossession procedures, and implementing the recently enacted personal insolvency reforms:


  • The CBI will establish by end-March a target requiring banks to offer a substantial share of restructuring arrangements during 2013 (proposed structural benchmark) (MEFP ¶5). A target for completing such arrangements during 2013 will be set subsequently, prior to the completion of the 11th review. Critically, the CBI will monitor each bank‘s progress closely, including by auditing samples of loan modifications to ensure they can be expected to durably address arrears.
  • The CBI will also modify the CCMA by end-June, where appropriate to facilitate effective engagement with mortgage borrowers in arrears (MEFP ¶6). The CBI intends to review in particular (i) the restrictions on contacts to facilitateconstructive engagement, where it recently provided a clarification; (ii) amending the definition of non-cooperating borrowers to ensure protections are limited to borrowers where engagement is timely and consistent with addressing their arrears; and (iii) the current protection on tracker mortgages, specifically in cases where a borrowers is offered an alternative arrangement that is advantageous in the long-term. Staff considers a thorough review of the CCMA appropriate as the emphasis shifts from forbearance to resolution, and notes in particular the need to ensure unsecured lenders are not advantaged in collections.
  • To facilitate durable resolution results, the authorities will also ensure that repossession procedures work efficiently in practice (MEFP ¶7). Repossessions declined in recent years despite the rise in arrears. The authorities remain committed to remove unintended constraints through legislative amendments to be submitted to parliament by end-March (MEFP ¶12, eighth review), with a view of passing them into law by around mid-year. This step is important to facilitate the funding needed for a renewal of mortgage lending on reasonable terms, and it will also facilitate conclusion of agreements to modify a loan and help ensure they are lasting solutions, while containing the risk that such modifications reduce payments by borrowers that can afford to pay. In addition, the authorities will keep repossession experience under review, and quickly bring forward appropriate measures to address any problems regarding the length, predictability, and cost of proceedings; Box 4 outlines some potential steps. Staff noted the need for prudential policies on banks‘ property management and vendor financing to facilitate reasonably timely disposal of property while avoiding market disruption.


Box 4. Enhancing the Efficiency of the Repossession Regime
Recent international experience underscores the need for efficient repossession procedures, while ensuring proper protection of the interests of the debtor.
Prolonged and costly procedures to seize mortgage collateral tend to be associated with slower recovery of property markets. In Ireland, the overall number of repossessions is very low, at some 0.3 percent of total arrears cases in 2012, compared with rates of 3 to 5 percent in the U.K. and U.S., suggesting a need to strengthen the efficiency of the repossession regime.

Irish lenders may seek repossession either based on statute or on the mortgage terms.
For residential properties, a homeowner cannot be required to give up possession save by court order due to constitutional protections. Lenders may bring a case in the Circuit Court or in the High Court, with costs significantly higher in the latter. Summary proceedings are deemed most efficient, while plenary proceedings are also available but take significantly longer due to procedural requirementss However, in the case of mortgages secured on registered property, following a case in mid-2011 there is uncertainty about the ability of lenders to pursue summary repossession proceedings for mortgages created prior to December 2009. This appears to have led to a fall in proceedings in 2012, and the authorities intend to introduce legislation ensuring the availability of summary proceedings under the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009.

The planned legislative change will help but additional measures for enhancing efficiency should be explored.
Banks report Circuit Court proceedings take a number of years due to adjournments and subsequent appeals. By comparison, the process is faster in the U.K. with many cases completed in one to two years. An example of an expedited and centralized approach already exists in Ireland, with the Commercial Court at the High Court providing a fast track to repossession for commercial properties valued above €1 million, due to streamlined proceedings and few adjournments. This suggests that as a further step to enhance the efficiency of the repossession regime—while maintaining the necessary protections—the designation of specialist judges at the High Court (or perhaps large Circuit Courts) could concentrate expertise and provide resources for handling a potentially larger volume of repossession cases in an expedited manner. Another option would be to prescribe in legislation the conditions that must be assessed by the court prior to adjourning a case, for example, that the debtor has made a material (not token) payment to the lender and presented a substantive proposal for repayment in a timely manner.

The new personal insolvency framework is expected to become operational in the second quarter
The Personal Insolvency Act was signed into law on December 26, 2012 (Annex II). The authorities intend to appoint specialist judges, publish regulations, and begin issuing licenses for personal insolvency practitioners by end-March, with a view to start accepting insolvency applications in the second quarter. Guidelines on reasonable allowable household expenditures will soon provide key input guiding debt service schedules proposed under the new debt resolution processes and may also shape banks‘ loan restructuring offers.
22. By end-May, the CBI will update the 2011 Impairment Provisioning and Disclosure Guidelines (proposed structural benchmark), which will give further momentum to durable restructuring efforts
. As a first step, the CBI is engaging with banks to ensure key inputs for provisioning of loans, especially modified loans, are appropriately prudent. Taking into account an assessment of the application of the current guidelines, the CBI will then update the guidelines, where necessary, setting out clear definitions and principles underpinning bank‘s provisioning models. In the context of their ongoing efforts to strengthen financial supervision the authorities have also requested an external Basle Core Principles assessment (structural benchmark from the 8th review) that will be carried out during the second half of 2013.
 
http://www.independent.ie/business/...trackers-should-lose-tax-relief-29358866.html

Latest IMF spiel...

"HOMEOWNERS with good-value tracker mortgages should lose their tax relief, the IMF has recommended.
This would be a way for the State to subsidise domestic banks for the huge losses they are making on these mortgages.
Around half-a-million people get mortgage tax relief on 350,000 mortgage accounts, according to Revenue"
If the tracker is fully paid up, they should be told where to go.

Probably just a shot across the bows of people on trackers but also in arrears.
 
Back
Top