As the title says, I have been thinking about those "spend 50 get 10 euro off" vouchers in Supervalu etc.
I have a half-formed aversion to them (while still availing of them), along the following lines.
We all know that businesses need to cover their costs and make a profit, that is a given. So regardless of any offers, loss leaders etc. they have to price things overall so that they make money at the end of the day. This means that they factor in the cost of the "10€ off" in the overall pricing of the goods sold.
It is possible that the less wealthy/poorer shoppers would be more likely to not reach or afford the required spend and therefore to avail of the discount. They would end up paying more overall for the goods that they buy. i.e. if the 10€ off didn't exist then all goods in the shop would be at a lower price.
Therefore this is in effect a tax on the poorer shoppers.
(Sgt Vimes boot theory springs to mind) https://terrypratchett.com/explore-discworld/sam-vimes-boots-theory-of-socio-economic-unfairness/
(A counter argument would be that the shop sells more goods, and therefore the fixed costs are spread over more goods, and hence they are priced lower is possible)
I'd be interested in your thoughts.
I have a half-formed aversion to them (while still availing of them), along the following lines.
We all know that businesses need to cover their costs and make a profit, that is a given. So regardless of any offers, loss leaders etc. they have to price things overall so that they make money at the end of the day. This means that they factor in the cost of the "10€ off" in the overall pricing of the goods sold.
It is possible that the less wealthy/poorer shoppers would be more likely to not reach or afford the required spend and therefore to avail of the discount. They would end up paying more overall for the goods that they buy. i.e. if the 10€ off didn't exist then all goods in the shop would be at a lower price.
Therefore this is in effect a tax on the poorer shoppers.
(Sgt Vimes boot theory springs to mind) https://terrypratchett.com/explore-discworld/sam-vimes-boots-theory-of-socio-economic-unfairness/
(A counter argument would be that the shop sells more goods, and therefore the fixed costs are spread over more goods, and hence they are priced lower is possible)
I'd be interested in your thoughts.