R
Rad
Guest
Hi,
I have a few rented properties all on interest only (ECB + 1.25%) which is ending this summer, they are rented and covering the mortgage at todays value with excess of 20%.
I also have a jumbo mortgage (excess 750K) in my principal residence (0 equity but not neg) which is also on interest only (ECB + .75%). This period of interest only ends in two years.
Today all is well and I haven't missed a mortgage payment in 20 years.
Problem is I lost my job late last year and my new job is currently paying 40% less. I am on a three day week however later this year / next year I will be moved to a 5 day week taking my earnings to more or less what they were.
Today I do not have the funds to repay a interest + capital mortgage on the rental when the IO period ends.
Has anyone had any experience of negotiating this situation with the banks, i.e. extending the interest only period?
I know there are a few here will say wtf was i doing getting into this situation but when I did this deal on these properties in 2004/2005 I had 50% LTV. All made sense at the time
Thanks,
R.
I have a few rented properties all on interest only (ECB + 1.25%) which is ending this summer, they are rented and covering the mortgage at todays value with excess of 20%.
I also have a jumbo mortgage (excess 750K) in my principal residence (0 equity but not neg) which is also on interest only (ECB + .75%). This period of interest only ends in two years.
Today all is well and I haven't missed a mortgage payment in 20 years.
Problem is I lost my job late last year and my new job is currently paying 40% less. I am on a three day week however later this year / next year I will be moved to a 5 day week taking my earnings to more or less what they were.
Today I do not have the funds to repay a interest + capital mortgage on the rental when the IO period ends.
Has anyone had any experience of negotiating this situation with the banks, i.e. extending the interest only period?
I know there are a few here will say wtf was i doing getting into this situation but when I did this deal on these properties in 2004/2005 I had 50% LTV. All made sense at the time
Thanks,
R.