No(I thought they were obliged by law to supply it on all correspondence
Not for a sole trader or partnership (ie if there is no "Ltd" on their name)but that might be the company number I am thinking of).
Hi,
We are looking at getting some work done by a builder and have been quoted a price including VAT at 13.5%. I would like to confirm that this builder actually is registered for VAT so that he is not pocketing the money for himself - and to confirm he is no a chancer!
I know the following at the moment:
(1) Company correspondence is on headed notepaper with his company name (eg: Expert Building Services)
(2) Correspondence has a footer saying "Registered Office .... , .... , ....."
HOWEVER when I try to lookup the company and the persons name on the CRO website it is not registered there. I know by the way that is not the same as registering for VAT.
So my assumption now would be that the builder is trading as a Sole Trader - how can I check whether the Sole Trader is registered for VAT? Ring Revenue is the obvious answer I know - any others?
Cheers,
pbyrne
Your concerns are understandable but in reality I doubt if such fraudulent activity would be common because it is a very serious matter to fool around with VAT charges/payments.
But for peace of mind if the builder provided is registered for VAT purposes, his written quote should clearly state the VAT rate, the VAT amount as well as his VAT Nr. You can subsequently check with the Revenue (VAT) if the VAT Nr is valid etc.
All invoices should also clearly state the VAT rate(s), amount(s) and VAT Nr.
It is a very serious offence for any vendor to charge any customers VAT if not registered for VAT purposes and/also to fail to make and return undervalued etc VAT payments to Collector General.
If the builder has been established for any reasonable length of time, (ie longer than a month or two) you can take it as certain that he is vat-registered. The Revenue would simply not tolerate any builder operating on his own account or as a subcontractor without registering for VAT - unless there is very good reason why they are satisfied that he is under the turnover threshold. As far as you are concerned, this is a non-issue. As the other poster said, at this stage, you should be more interested in the quality of their work, and the exact terms and conditions of their pricing than trying to do the Revenue's work for them. If they fail to give you a proper VAT invoice on completion of the work, you can report this to the Revenue at that stage if you feel like it, so there is no need to concern yourself about this particular point at this stage.
I am sorry to say but revenue would have no idea that this builder or any other business was in operation unless someone told them about it. I know many people who have being operating for many years and not only do they not pay vat they dont pay tax. If you want to know if the builder is registered ring revenue yourself and ask them.If the builder has been established for any reasonable length of time, (ie longer than a month or two) you can take it as certain that he is vat-registered. The Revenue would simply not tolerate any builder operating on his own account or as a subcontractor without registering for VAT - unless there is very good reason why they are satisfied that he is under the turnover threshold. As far as you are concerned, this is a non-issue. As the other poster said, at this stage, you should be more interested in the quality of their work, and the exact terms and conditions of their pricing than trying to do the Revenue's work for them. If they fail to give you a proper VAT invoice on completion of the work, you can report this to the Revenue at that stage if you feel like it, so there is no need to concern yourself about this particular point at this stage.
I hate to disillusion you Scaper, but this kind of fraudulent activity is actually VERY common, hence the announcement in the not too distant past by the Revenue that their investigation's branch would be raising the level of investigation and enforcement in the construction industry, regarding registration, returns, sub-contractor vs employee, etc.Your concerns are understandable but in reality I doubt if such fraudulent activity would be common because it is a very serious matter to fool around with VAT charges/payments...
Did you bother reading my post at all before you chose to reply? Read it again, and you will see that my post covered pretty much all the points you raise above.Btw, it makes no difference whether a quote is outlined on a "VAT inclusive" or "plus VAT" basis, once this is clearly demonstrated on the quote, as it was in this case. When dealing with non-registered customers, most trades quotes will be quoted on a VAT inclusive basis.If a builder fails to provide clarity with potential costs it is more likely going to be more to difficult to resolve any disputes over actual costs. Surely it is a straightforward task for any contractor to itemise all costs and show other charges such as VAT, rate and amounts etc separately.
Where a builder provides a prospective customer with a quote with an inclusive figure of VAT and it transpires that the builder is not VAT registered than in such circumstances the prospective customer should report builder to the revenue. It is difficult though not impossible to imagine why a builder would not be registered for VAT. Also there have also been cases where registered companies including builders have made underpayments of VAT and PAYE etc etc to the Revenue.
You would also agree that we all have responsibility to help authorities identify and punish any instance of where fraud, malpractice etc occurs.
Btw, it makes no difference whether a quote is outlined on a "VAT inclusive" or "plus VAT" basis, once this is clearly demonstrated on the quote, as it was in this case. When dealing with non-registered customers, most trades quotes will be quoted on a VAT inclusive basis.
Final question on this if yez don't mind - should I really be getting a quote with the labour and materials broken down separately. While taxing myself thinking about this whole VAT question I realised that I am probably being charged VAT on a figure that includes materials, on which the builder will have paid and reclaim VAT already.
So in my example the job might cost say 30k inc. VAT, of which materials are 9k. So I am paying additional VAT on 9k @ 13.5%? The builder will be able to reclaim the VAT on that 9k so it goes into his business as profit on the job also?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?