They are excluded from cost rental schemes because they can't afford them? And so they have to go to the normal market, supposedly more expensive? That makes a lot of sense to me??!From what I understand they'd be excluded because they couldn't afford it.
If you are a private property owner, you cannot advertise your property excluding HAP claimants. Nor can you tell anyone who contacts you that they can't afford the rent if they are claiming HAP.From what I understand they'd be excluded because they couldn't afford it.
Strange if there's that law for private but not state-assisted (I'm aware there's a law against discrimination, but not clear on how or if it's tied to the price advertised). It should be the same law for all.If you are a private property owner, you cannot advertise your property excluding HAP claimants. Nor can you tell anyone who contacts you that they can't afford the rent if they are claiming HAP.
That makes no sense; they could be under notice to quit & in receipt of HAP.can't be in hap when they originally apply because by being on HAP their housing need is deemed to have been met.
Far from ideal, but most HAP tenants know they are on a good deal and don't want to risk eviction. It's not like the tenants of LA properties who know eviction is highly unlikely.Its a bad contract for the landlord to be forced to take a financially vulnerable tennant. Absolutely crazy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?