Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,793
The faith in bitcoin is not based on tulip - style limited supply. It's things like decentralisation, permission-less innovation, transparency , privacy that make it attractive.
It is exactly the same, in both cases their worth depends on confidence, nothing else.
I think its worthwhile to separate Bitcoin and the underlying blockchain technology. I have no idea where any of the cryptocurrencies will end up but I am reasonably sure that blockchain technology will be successful
I agree, that is why I bought some. Mostly out of curiosity in trying to understand it.
But as I have begun to understand it more, at least to my understanding, I have also bought some other crypto's. It is becoming more of a collection of fine crypto currencies, which in itself is bizarre.
Not to derail the topic but was just wondering what exchange and wallet you used to buy other cryptos ?
I first heard of Bitcoin when it was about €80 a coin and I dismissed it as I hadn't a clue. Kept on hearing about it, kept on dismissing it.
Finally tried to learn about it. The jury is still out for me but I have heard enough to consider buying some. My purchases of bitcoin to date are very modest and I haven't actually used it to buy anything or trade with someone else.
But what convinced me to get involved is the reporting around the blockchain technology. I don't fully understand it nor could I explain it but I think I understand the concept. It is that understanding that makes bitcoin very interesting.
I would be of the mind that global government backed fiat currencies are devaluing at a faster and faster rate. Cash will certainly become, if not a thing of the past, a nostalgic item like vinyl.
All transactions are going digital, so what is the point of having multiple international currencies? These are useful within the borders of countries, but in a globalised digital world, a binary code is the same in Alaska as it is in Zambia.
So who will control a globalised digital currency? Well, if it's decentralized, then no-one but the users themselves. Sovereignty will rest with the individual, not the State.
There are still more questions than answers, but ones relating to multiple crypto currencies can be answered by pointing to multiple national currencies.
What about claims that it is being used for money laundering? Perhaps so, but so what? Cash and the banking system is also used for money laundering, still we use it today.
It has no intrinsic value? Neither has anything really, unless there is a demand for it. That demand being generated by a confidence. Certainly, the confidence in blockchain technology is growing.
Anyway, that's my tuppence worth (or 0.0000012 of bitcoin). Gradually becoming a believer, just wished I did so at €80!
A limited supply means very little if an item has no intrinsic value. The Dutch learnt the lesson of intrinsic value in the late 1600s when Tulip-mania took over. The only intrinsic value tulips had then (and now) was the cost of production, but the Dutch forgot that for a few years, and lives were ruined in the too often human pursuit of riches without effort.
Still a Rory Gillen fan I see Brendan, even though he has turned his back on AAM.
Current levels look bubbly to me but I've never looked at it in enough detail so I could be wrong.
But what inspires confidence in bitcoin?
The exact same thing as with the tulips - believe! And just like the tulips, if that belief is shattered it will rapidly loose value. You cannot invest in anything who's value is based on fear and greed. You can speculate, but then you should recognize it, for what it is.
But go ahead to India , Venezuela , Argentina, Cyprus etc and tell them Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are like tulips.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?