Many thanks.A. is the only valid treatment. It's the gift itself that gives rise to the tax liability. This cannot be ducked or avoided by reallocating it.
Similarly, if it said 'Jane Bloggs & Family'
Might that, like the original scenario, be affected by the gift splitting rules on tax treatment?She could possibly repay the 30000 loan back to her uncle. Her uncle could then write out 5 cheques, one to each family member, for 3000 now. Then he could do the same on 1st January 2024.
Thanks. Treading carefully here. Just trying to tease out the issue. The uncle is frustrated that almost a third of his gift will go to revenue rather than his niece and family. It appears that he could have named all 5 family members on the cheque and minimised the tax due. Or preferably written 5 cheques. Lesson learned.Be careful of any shenanigans designed mainly or solely to avoid tax as they may fall group foul of Revenue's anti-avoidance rules.
The uncle is frustrated that almost a third of his gift will go to revenue rather than his niece and family. It appears that he could have named all 5 family members on the cheque and minimised the tax due.
Sorry, this is a discussion forum, not a facility for specific advice.Many thanks.
Presumably if both names are on the cheque that would change the gift to a 50:50 split as per B? Or is it essential to have 2 separate cheques?
Similarly, if it said 'Jane Bloggs & Family' could/should it be split equally among the 5 family members?
Thanks again.
Noted, thanks. I appreciate the feedback. But the devil is in the detail and I think its worthwhile for the benefit of other forum users to be able to learn from this example rather than ask the same questions or repeat the same mistakes.Sorry, this is a discussion forum, not a facility for specific advice.
Otherwise, @ClubMan's caveat about tax avoidance refers.
For the benefit anyone watching this thread, I contacted the National CAT Information Unit in Revenue on the matter and was advised verbally that B is acceptable and appropriate i.e. I become the beneficiary of 50% of the gift from my wife's uncle and I need to declare same.Hi All,
I've been reading up on CAT and gift splitting but haven't been able to get clarify on the most tax efficient/appropriate treatment for the following situation.
My wife receives a gift cheque in 2023 of €30k from her uncle. Its made out in her name only. She lodges it to our joint current account as all of our banking is in joint names.
She has been fortunate to receive an inheritance 10+ years ago from another uncle. Her lifetime Category B allowance for gifts is therefore used up.
Regarding tax liability I would appreciate some advice on which is the best way forward regarding tax treatment.
A. The simplest and worst case as I see it is that she would owe 30k-3k (annual gift exemption) = 27k * 33% tax = 9k in CAT owed this year.
B. If she lodges the cheque in our joint account has she effectively split the gift and gifted me €15k of the €30k? I therefore should declare a gift of €15k from her uncle. The first €3k is treated as annual gift. I have never received any gifts like this before so have a lifetime allowance (Category C) of €16,250 before tax is due. I can use 12k of my 16,250 lifetime allowance. So no tax due for me. My wife owes 33% tax on (15k - 3k) = 4k CAT owed.
C. Taking B a step further. We have 3 children. If she transfers 3 x 3k of the 30k into bank accounts in each of their names, could that also be treated as gift splitting? i.e. the original source of the gifts to our children is their grand uncle. The balance (21k) is then treated as a gift split between my wife and myself. CAT liability stays at zero for me and reduces to 33% of (10.5-3)= 2.5k for my wife
D. And finally, if C is acceptable, could we chose to split the gift anyway we like within our family to minimize tax liability e.g. kids receive 3 x 3k as above. Use 15,000 of lifetime limit plus my 3k annual allowance = 18k. My wife is gifted the balance of 3k which is exempt. So no tax due at all in this scenario. This feels too good to be true but worth asking.
Many thanks
Agreed. And thankfully Revenue are indicating agreement also. I've sought confirmation in writing.Clearly the answer isn’t ‘A’. The Gift-Splitting rules kick-in, which are themselves a form of anti-avoidance. So any talk of general anti-avoidance makes no sense.
Look at this another way via an example:
Someone gets a gift of €19,250 from a stranger. That person lodges the cheque into a joint account that they hold with their spouse, but it transpires that the spouse previously received a €19,250 gift from another stranger, so the Group C Threshold is gone. Then Revenue subject the couple to an Audit. It’s a ‘gotcha’ moment, where the Gift-Splitting anti-avoidance rules kick-in and there’s a tax liability. Having one’s cake and eating it is rarely possible in life, even for Revenue.
Be careful of going by what Revenue staff tell you. They are sometimes completely wrong and you have no come back if you act on erroneous info that they give you. If on doubt get independent professional advice.The person I spoke to in Revenue CAT section advised that there's nothing wrong with gift splitting.
Would you say that even about their written clarification or do you mean what they tell you over the phone? Surely I'm on pretty firm ground if they provide a written response to a specific query and I act on it.Be careful of going by what Revenue staff tell you. They are sometimes completely wrong and you have no come back if you act on erroneous info that they give you. If on doubt get independent professional advice.
Both. They may provide information but not advice. And sometimes the info that they provide is erroneous. If in doubt get independent advice.Would you say that even about their written clarification or do you mean what they tell you over the phone? Surely I'm on pretty firm ground if they provide a written response to a specific query and I act on it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?