Wow, just wow. So now companies can discriminate against companies as long as the criteria suits some made-up list by people who have nothing better to do. What will happen when they require to employ drain cleaners or nurses ?Ethical sourcing is a growing trend, and companies are seeking out this type of information so that they can rule out suppliers they feel don't meet their standards on eliminating discrimination on grounds such as gender, age, etc..
Wow, just wow. So now companies can discriminate against companies as long as the criteria suits some made-up list by people who have nothing better to do.
Yeah, hardly a surprise there? People and private companies are free to shop where they like. If a private individual or a company have strong ethical standards, why should they not choose to spend their own money supporting other companies that share that ethos?
If you're choosing between two pretty much identical products, one from a company that is investing in ensuring more equal opportunities and the other from a company known to discriminate against older people or minorities, or with a very poor environmental record, are you suggesting you shouldn't be allowed take those factors into account?
No problem whatsoever with that. But how are they going to assess that by getting the ages and genders of the people who are going to do the work for them ?
I've no problem with the audit. Companies should know who is in their supply chain.Wow, just wow. So now companies can discriminate against companies as long as the criteria suits some made-up list by people who have nothing better to do. What will happen when they require to employ drain cleaners or nurses ?
I have seen this where a company doesn't want to work with a revolving door of people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?