I have been looking through some of the threads in relation to SAR (subject access requests) to banks by individuals and a common theme is missing data/records in relation the customers files and communications - in particular call records.
In light of GDPR in May 2018, will the banks use this as an excuse to delete what they deem to be non-essential data, further reducing access to this very important information?
I wonder should the Oireachtas committee/Central Bank would not ask the banks to release their historic call recordings to a trusted (secure) party while this investigation is on-going, and for this 3rd party to deploy a "speech to text" analytics solution which would convert all the call recordings to text and allow data analytics determine if keywords have been used during calls - for example the word 'TRACKER'? Given this type of software is relatively commonly available, I do not understand how it has not been used to date to validate what the banks are saying around impacted customers.
The only challenge I see here is the format/encoding of the audio files, but cannot imagine they would be that difficult to handle - unless of course the call recordings have been deleted, in which case there is probably not that much that can be done.
It will be very interesting to see if GDPR helps or hinders the tracker redress process.... Only time will tell I am guessing