prince2008
Registered User
- Messages
- 29
Hi All
I've been reading all the previous threads about mortgages and first time buyers etc.
Basically, after years of renting, I'm hoping to buy a house maybe in the next 6 months to a year. Maybe sooner, if I see something I like that I can afford!
I was thinking of going to speak to a broker in order to get the ball rolling - hopefully then we can get approval in principal so it would be safe enough to put a deposit down if something comes up. Both myself and my partner are FTB's with a combined salary of approx €74K pa. I've read all the pro's and con's of going to a broker but I really don't have the time to take off work in order to visit all the lenders seperately so I was thinking a broker would be the best bet.
Was just wondering if I go to speak to a broker etc etc, in the mean time could I ring around the banks myself (if I get the time!)? Will the banks know that I have maybe already applied through a broker? Would this go against my application?
Even though I have been reading up on mortages, all the different rates/types of mortages etc etc is all a bit confusing - this is why I was thinking a broker would be the best option.
We have joint savings of abt €40K and was hoping to purchase a property for under €300K.
Many thanks for any advice.
Everyone has advised that I obtain approval in principle before I look at houses. However, with most lenders, this only lasts about 3 months - max 6 - if we dont take up their offer in this time frame we will have to start the process again. Unfortunately, I don't know when I'm going to see a house I like at the right price so it may take longer than this. Does anybody have any experience of applying again for approval in principle? Would the banks dislike this and think I was just wasting their time????
It's not necessarily a bad idea, because having the longer term available can give you greater flexibility at expensive times (initial furnishings, or weddings, or babies, or illness); in my opinion it *is* a bad idea to operate on the basis that you *won't* pay it off until then. It can be useful to take the longer term, to overpay when your income allows, and reduce to the basic payment when you're facing into higher expenses.Also, does anybody have any opinions on taking out a mortgage over a 35 year period which will bring one of the applicants up to the age of 70 - some lenders are willing to do this. Is this a bad idea considering most people would be retired by then???
You need to be careful about that one. If you're on a fixed rate, it's not always possible to overpay on an ad hoc basis (although some fixed rate mortgages do provide slightly greater flexibility). Even some variable or tracker rate products may have limits on when, how or how much you may overpay, though these usually aren't too confining.With regard to getting the 35 year mortgage - obviously I would be hoping that I would have it paid off sooner on the basis that trying to pay the mortgage when we are both retired may prove a tad difficult. I was just advised to take out the mortgage over the longest time - so that the repayments would be lower in the first couple of years so we would have some funds to do up the house. I was told then that if we had some spare money then we can just pay it off the mortgage ad hoc - is this right???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?