Thanks for the reply.
I am hoping to move from a managed private pension to a simpler blend of indexed funds, and reduce fees. The pension is substantial and will become very substantial over the next few years. The company I am a director of has substantial funds that I want to move across into my own pension.
The closest thing to it would be a Self-Adminstered Scheme with a fixed fee plus an Execution Only stockbroking account to hold ETFs.
That's not universally the case.The world of money deals in %
That's not universally the case.
In the UK, for example, flat fee SIPPs are the norm. After all is said and done, it's just an account.
I would love to be able to manage my own pension savings on a platform that charges a reasonable annual fee but that seems to be a pipe dream.
:mad:
€2k!!!!Would you not pay a Trustee a flat fee?
e.g. €2k
€2k!!!!
In the UK, you can set up a SIPP on a platform for a flat fee of around €150pa, with no ongoing commissions. Funds costs are obviously extra.
Incidentally, I don't agree that 25bps is negligible for a platform. Again, it's basically just an account.
€2k!!!!
In the UK, you can set up a SIPP on a platform for a flat fee of around €150pa, with no ongoing commissions. Funds costs are obviously extra.
Incidentally, I don't agree that 25bps is negligible for a platform. Again, it's basically just an account.
I wish!But on the basis of the €1.4m you’ve got in there, that’s only 14bps.
Well, I assume it's profitable or the platforms wouldn't be in business.How do they make money charging €150 a year?
Well, I assume it's profitable or the platforms wouldn't be in business.
Bear in mind that there is no advice or unnecessary reporting involved - it's simply a trading platform.
I'm sure the big platforms host tens, maybe even hundreds, of thousands of SIPPs.228 accounts to pay for a salary of £30,000 a year (including employer national insurance).
I would argue that the question an adviser should really be asking is how can we provide such value in Ireland rather than defend the status quo which does not serve the majority of clients very well.
% charges (...read commission) is a very silly way of charging from a client's perspective - at least, for most clients. I suspect that financial advisers will not agree with this because they are conflicted and "it is difficult for people to understand things when their income stream is best served by not understanding things." Dems de facts....rough-hew them how you will....
Steven,
Insurance companies can take a monthly policy fee - e.g. €3.50 per month.
There is no reason why they could not also deduct a monetary adviser fee in the same way.
This would be far more transparent and fairer.
Imagine someone with a million euro in an ARF receiving an annual statement:
Opening balance: €1,000,000
Investment growth € 20,000
Withdrawals (€ 40,000)
Adviser commission (€ 5,000)
Closing balance € 975,000
As I said, I didn't expect you to understand or agree - rough-hew it how you will.
In this way, the client can ask what service did I receive for my €5k this year, remembering that investment strategy is a long-term game.
I have lots of clients that pay me a flat fee and I am quite happy to charge on that basis.
I fully understand and have told you that I am quite happy to be paid on a fixed fee basis.
I have had conversations with insurance companies about this and they don't offer it, it would require a massive change in their systems to do it.
I would think that there are other issues to be fought before this one such as the smoke and mirror of brokers charging large upfront commissions and telling clients that there is no cost to them when the real cost is a large amc that will be levied against their money for decades.
You have also focused on advisors charging fees as a % but never mentioned the provider or the fund managers. Should they charge on a fixed fee basis too? Would this make access to investments unrealistic to the small investor who wants to save a few hundred a month?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?