Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,788
If they don't cancel your flight, but it's delayed a few hours, you might not get compensation.
The trade union should be made liable for the compensation for any delays, not the airline.
Brendan
Curious about role of European commission - why three cheers to them ?Agreed. The employer accepted the Labour Court's recommendation and the Union didn't, yet the employer is punished for the Union's intransigence - three cheers for the European Commission!
I had flights cancelled 2 years ago this week due to baggage handlers in Bordeaux. Aer Lingus refunded the fare as alternative flights were unsuitable. Compo was refused and the flight compo company couldn't get anything either. Travel insurance eventually covered other expenses. What compensation do you think you could claim for?Thanks, Brendan.
I have a flight back from Italy in 11 days time, and am considering the same offer that you availed of.
However, the new flight will be considerably more expensive, so assuming I don't take up their offer & they cancel the flight, am I right in saying that I will be able to claim under the EU Scheme ?
Presumably because of the legislation requiring airlines pay compensation to passengers affected by strikes of this nature, inflicting an increased burden on the business.Curious about role of European commission - why three cheers to them ?
(Well I tried to get the refund but the site is a little bit busy.)
i have flights booked - cork to Dubrovnik for mid july, and accommodation will take 2K approx from me (booking.com) on 2th july
Pilots are only striking 8 hours on one day. Working to rule only means not doing anything beyond what they are contractually obliged to. In response to this, the airline cancelled up to 20% of flights. Hard to reconcile that with the company saying they are not short pilots ....
Not if you understand how rostering works.
Imagine that the "work to rule" bunny's flight is delayed somewhere in Europe. He sits on the ground for a couple of hours and then announces to the 180 passengers that "sorry folks, my roster is up, so I'm not flying that crate back to Ireland. Thanks for flying with Aer Lingus"
Eh? So you saying a pilot can deliberately sit on the ground at a foreign airport, lose a takeoff slot, take up a stand for a few hours for no legitimate reason and claim work to rule? Yeah that's how it works alright......
If the flight is delayed and the pilot is out of hours or the cabin crew are out of hours, under law they are perfectly entitled not to fly. Rosters have nothing to do with it. Airline crews can only legally work a certain number of hours in the day. What the pilots won't do anymore is use their discretion (can be used under certain circumstancss) to work outside of those hours. That's work to rule. Nothing to do with not working contracted rosters including delays. Its to do with working outside legal hours. I wouldn't do overtime if I was in dispute with my company. Would you?
Aer Lingus "absolutely cannot” afford to cave into pilot demands for a 24 per cent pay increase, Willie Walsh, a former chief executive of the airline, has warned.
The reigning director general of the International Air Transport Association (Iata) said that he would “struggle to have sympathy” for pilots as they prepare for industrial action, and highlighted the potential toll of a strike on the company’s bottom line. Walsh, who joined Aer Lingus in 1979 and was appointed chief executive in 2001, said that the currently conflict is “very, very risky”, as the airline stands to lose more aircraft as the row progresses.
International Airlines Group (IAG), Aer Lingus’ parent firm, previously said that it intended to stall delivery of new aircraft to the Irish carrier until the pilots’ pay row is resolved. [Business Post]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?