Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,801
I came to the same conclusion not the same as a cryptocurrency no matter how I read it,It's not a cryptocurrency as it wouldn't use a decentralised, distributed ledger.
It's a system of vouchers which are redeemable at par with the US dollar, presumably guaranteed by facebook.
Nothing in any article i've seen, including the one quoted above, that aren't anything but total assumptions and written by no named people. Everyone and his mother with massive exposure like for example what Facebook have, would indeed be very keen to introduce a form of currency which would trade as such, but apart from unknown people writing about it there's nothing on it.
That remains to be seen. Bloomberg defined a stablecoin as a coin that tracks the U.S. dollar. Unless their 'sources' told them that FB plan on a stablecoin that tracks the USD, it could just as easily track the rupee. 2018 has seen a plethora of stablecoin projects emerge, some backed by FIAT (various - USD, YEN, Euro, CHF) or a mix of various FIAT, etc. Likewise with gold.The several hundred million Indians who use whatsapp will have absolutely no interest in:
- A payment system that is tied to the US dollar, when they get paid, and pay their taxes, in rupees; given that the dollar fluctuates against the rupee a lot.
This isn't a true crypto - it's a centralised ...well, many involved in crypto describe it as a centralised 5hitcoin. As regards fluctuation, crypto market cap is miniscule. As it grows it will improve but of course we're talking long term. As it stands today (should everyone want to sell their bitcoin to him and they wouldnt) Bill Gates could buy up every single BTC in circulation.The several hundred million Indians who use whatsapp will have absolutely no interest in:
- A true cryptocurrency whose value fluctuates hugely against every currency, all the time.
For sure, you're quite right. However, I've come to temper my views on how this all works and how it will work out. I think there are applications where total decentralisation is unnecessary. Alongside that, there are many people who simply don't care about decentralisation. I'm keeping an open mind as to how this will all pan out but with increased institutionalisation within the space, we're likely to see more psuedo decentralised crypto's being promoted.Repeat: this is not a cryptocurrency by any definition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?