David_Dublin
Registered User
- Messages
- 864
These do not at all look like a traditional brick wall, and the difference is immediately obvious. It's also nearly always a bad idea to cover historic brickwork. Many many buildings have been ruined from this.Thanks for the reply. I see some companies do slip brick solutions to allow for recrrating existing red brick look, so that might be an option for full EWI.
Then the only question is in relation to the concrete fascia and soffit, and cold bridging.
This is no longer the case. You can get brick slips from salvaged brick even - it's just a matter of specifying the correct final finish.These do not at all look like a traditional brick wall, and the difference is immediately obvious.
You might be surprised with what can be done. In any case, who goes right up to those bricks to see if they're this, that or the other?I'm willing to be corrected, but every example I've seen looks completely wrong. Old brick has all kinds of detailing at windows and roofs, which is what gives it most of its character, and you're never going to get it right covering it in slips.
All down to the person doing it. It's possible recreate all that character with slips, but it requires a tradesperson who knows what they're doing and isn't just out to take shortcuts.Old brick has all kinds of detailing at windows and roofs, which is what gives it most of its character, and you're never going to get it right covering it in slips.
My understanding is that if you mix drylining and external insulation you receive the grant for the one which is the majority. I asked this question of an SEAI rep at an energy-efficiency event as we are going to be in that exact situation (drylining the redbrick front to end-of-terrace house which will have EWI to side and rear) and he came back with that via email.I think we'll end up wrapping the side and back, and internally insulating the front, unless we see VERY persuasive examples of slip bricks being used. @pablo123 - to your point about grants, leaving out the front costs €4,500, i.e. the grant for end of terrace - that's quite a cost. And you'd also forego the internal as you'd be doing some EWI/some internal.
House has suspended timber floors. One option we were consderinf was filling the cavity, cuttong out the joists and pouring a eent floor. This to improve air tightness, amongst other things. Probably no air tightness consideration if doing full EWI, right?
Thanks @shweeney - I forgot that backfilling would be a requirement for EWI as otherwise one ends up with rotting floorboards. I may be wrong, but I would have thought that there are options when filling deeper voids, i.e. top x cms is concrete, the rest something cheaper .suspended floors have to be vented to avoid damp, insulation or not. Even if you bring the EWI down below the level of the floor (which you should, but my observations suggest a lot of contractors don't bother) you still need vents so the underfloor space will be still be "cold" which can lead to draughts and cold floors.
I don't know if it's cheaper to fill the void or to insulate the floorboards - both options are pretty disruptive. The void under some of our rooms is 5 feet deep so would require a lot of concrete. It's one of the things putting me off EWI (as well as the ludicrous cost and I'm dubious about the longevity and environmental impact of the cladding).
Thanks @shweeney - I forgot that backfilling would be a requirement for EWI as otherwise one ends up with rotting floorboards. I may be wrong, but I would have thought that there are options when filling deeper voids, i.e. top x cms is concrete, the rest something cheaper .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?