You don't require planning permission once you don't deviate from the character of a property as you have alluded to.Did you seek planning permission or get a certificate of exemption? I thought planning was required for a significant alteration to the character of a property.
Might become an issue if/ when you come to sell and the prospective purchaser's solicitor seeks confirmation of planning compliance.
No we did not I’m afraid. The redbrick was only on the front. Sides and back were rendered. Both sides visible from roadDid you seek planning permission or get a certificate of exemption? I thought planning was required for a significant alteration to the character of a property.
Might become an issue if/ when you come to sell and the prospective purchaser's solicitor seeks confirmation of planning compliance.
Replacing red brick with a render is considered a deviation from the character, it would be hard to argue the house doesn't look quite different. Will be easer in a neighbourhood of mixed properties, but wouldn't fly in a more uniform development.You don't require planning permission once you don't deviate from the character of a property as you have alluded to.
You could seek a Section 5 declaration and see whether your LA will consider this exempted development. More likely to be successful in a mixed development, and that would cover you for any future sale.No we did not I’m afraid. The redbrick was only on the front. Sides and back were rendered. Both sides visible from road
How many of them covered red brick and have sold in the meantime?external insulation virtually always changes the appearance of the house. Half a dozen houses in my estate have had it done and they all look substantially different to the original finish, none of them applied for PP. I'd be interested to know of anyone who's had enforcement taken against them as a result of applying insulation.
How many of them covered red brick and have sold in the meantime?
I haven't heard of LAs going after people applying external insulation, but providing a declaration of compliance with planning could be problematic with a drastic change in appearance from the granted permission and it seems solicitors are getting more demanding in that area. Moving the building line forward ~150mm or so would likely be considered substantially compliant subject to other factors like proximity to street, etc..not redbrick, but the houses are half stoneclad at the front, and that has been covered by the insulation. I don't think any have been sold.
Doesn't often happen but I know of cases where enforcement orders were issued over paint colours, but these were extreme cases like the red bricks on Lombard St. being painted in tricolours for the '02 World cup or buildings on historic streets.What constitutes changing the character though, if you replace your white PVC windows with grey? If you repaint your white house to yellow?
It is a mixed development road. Nearly every property is different. Done houses very old. Done built mid 90s. Some very recentYou could seek a Section 5 declaration and see whether your LA will consider this exempted development. More likely to be successful in a mixed development, and that would cover you for any future sale.
The ones on Lombard St. were ordered to change theirs back to the original colour. I assume if you stayed close to the colour you'd be fine, but planners are hard to predict at times.Just curious if you painted over redbrick do you need pp as this would look different also?
Is it? Can you produce anything to confirm this opinion? In some cases it may well be but I belive you're taking one extreme of the possible interpretation of character. As per the link I've shared earlier, if you pay attention to the appearance of the external insulation, you can easily have an end result where the house will not look "quite different", particularly where the insulating is clad in real brick slips.Replacing red brick with a render is considered a deviation from the character
Just read the planning acts and review planning applications in your area. There's a reason that you must submit drawings that detail all finishes to external walls as part of the planning process. It's not uncommon for the LAs to insist on changes to external finishes so that the character of this building better blends in its location. Any change away from the granted finishes is a development, and one not listed in Part 2 / exempted development.Is it? Can you produce anything to confirm this opinion? In some cases it may well be but I belive you're taking one extreme of the possible interpretation of character.
Ours looked different for a while but you will get used to it , If anything a good few of our neighbours followed suit and yes we are in an estate , The house looks fresher given it is nearly 40 years old and the savings regarding heating oil is more than I expected . We had our windows seals checked and had some replaced when we were at it .So presumably the red brick just isn’t visible anymore? Are you in a housing estate? Does your house look very different to the rest now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?