Unfortunately not. Do you know what I can do next?
Neither the Guards, your presumptions or our speculation here can clarify who is responsible for what. As previous poster has asked, what is the nature of your contract with the EA? This, combined with the letting agreement, defines the roles and responsibilities of the various parties. Ultimately as has been already said, in the absence of a court order, the Guards have no role to play.The guards told me the EA are responsible for evicting the tenent. They were paid the fee so I would presume they were responsible for the tenent. They found the tenent so would they not be responsible for getting rid of the tenent. They also wrote to the tenent telling them if they hadn't paid the rent in full they had to leave the apartment so they have done that much but now that the tenent is not paying they seem to be walking away from the situation.
the Guards have no role to play.
The landlord in this case did not comply with the law by registering with the PRTB!I think once the PRTB hears the case and assuming the decision is his favour...
The landlord in this case did not comply with the law by registering with the PRTB!
I didn't think that the landlord's failure to register with the PRTB impacted the tenant's ability to claim the rented accommodation tax credit whatever about the landlord's ability to write off mortgage interest against rental income?Failure to register with the PRTB doesn't cancel out the breach by the tenant and can be remedied (whatever about the tenants right to claim tax relief for the unregistered period.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?