Similar question:
Dear all.
I am looking for some advice, as usual!
I work year to year contract usually. I had my own PRSA (evergreen BOI). This year, I got a 2 yr contract which included a 12% contribution to a pension scheme, also a PRSA scheme.
I wanted to keep things the way they were and keep my own PRSA by diverting the contribution into it, but HR said that I couldn’t – have to go with their scheme. … . . or else I lose the 12% contribution!
So I went ahead and froze my PRSA and opened the new one.
Now people in the office are coming up against the same thing (the offer of a pension is a new thing in this neck of the woods). 1 person says that he’s going to negotiate a cash-back equivalent with HR and the other is going to try and do exactly what I wanted – divert the contribution into his evergreen pension with BOI.
HR where I work can be wrong and have been wrong in the past. In my workplace, there are folk in permanent positions that are entitled to a pension. I think the type of contract I was given (that includes a pension) was new to them and HR gave me ‘the standard response’.
Once I heard that my colleagues were questioning their options, I said I’d throw this one to the folks on AAM.
What’s legal here?
If HR were right in saying that I have to go with their scheme or lose the contribution – why is this?
Thanks in advance.