Thank you for the reply. I am just so worried at the moment as my accounts are due and he is refusing to sign them unless I pay up. I have a lot of money invested in the company and am there for the long haul but he has nothing. He does get some benefits as in a petrol card and his mobile paid but never wanted to work in the company just liked the idea of being a director and I needed an additional person at the time, so it semed like a good idea, now, technically I am being blackmailed. I would have thought if the co really has not got the money to pay then that should be it, but maybe not.
As far as I recall the 10000 tax free is allowed as compensation for 'loss of earnings'. Has he had any earnings over the years ? If not he is not entitled to claim the 10000 tax free.
If the company is not worth anything and shows a loss, surely it goes on the value of the share i.e. 1 euro each and he has 50% share holding?
...if your other director has been getting expenses and no salary, there may be a tax issue to discuss with the company accountant/auditor. I believe ( correct me here ) that to be entitled to expenses a director must have a salary or it's not tax deductible for the company. Look at the logic, who would be working for expenses only and no salary.
Hi Graham,
I'm not sure of the actual position in relation to this point, but I suspect your understanding may not be 100% correct. I would have thought that there are situations where it is reasonable and legitimate for someone to be receiving expenses even if they are receiving no salary. For example in the sports & voluntary sector, it is commonplace for volunteers to receive expenses in the absence of any salaries being paid - GAA players and managers come to mind. Also where a company is insufficiently profitable to justify paying a salary to a director/owner, I believe it should be still acceptable for the director/owner to claim vouched expenses in compliance with normal Revenue guidelines.
I am intrigued by your mention of a Revenue auditor disallowing expenses where a director had expenses and no salary. I wonder were they technically correct in doing so?
(I) wonder if its something buried deep in an inspector manual somewhere but not specifically excluded in legislation.
Me also.
...or maybe in her imagination? You never know....
Best of luck with it anyhow.
So leave the legal stuff to the experts. Get a solicitor.Sorry about all these questions, you must all think I have no business sense, but I am more hands on day to day, than used to dealing wth all the legal stuff.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?