I must pay my telephone/broadband service provider by Direct Debit, and while I am quite happy with both my telephone and broadband service, their billing leaves an awful lot to be desired. For all sorts of reasons, none of which I can fathom, all of my last 8 monthly bills have been wrong. The company have willingly admitted this, but it has brought something to light that I didn't know, and can hardly believe.
It seems the term 'Direct Debit' is a loose term which covers several different types of payments, my one being what is termed a 'Regular Payment' - regular in timing, not in amount. I had understood, wrongly, it seems that a responsibility of a company recieving a direct debit was that they would inform you beforehand what sums they were proposing to take from your bank acc, or credit card acc, so that if there was a dispute, it could be raised, and possibly rectified in time. However that isn't the case. With this particular company, once the bill is issued, it's pretty much a done deal, as they claim that any credit adjustments to a bill or account takes 10 days to process, by which time the direct debit has gone through. I checked this with the National Consumer Agency who told me that it would be covered by the Financial Regulator, who in turn advised me to contact the National Consumer Agency!
I am told by the Financial Regulator's office that there exists no legislation, regulations, or even guidelines as to how companies carry out these transactions, and that should a mistake occur, which God knows does happen, and should that mistake by the company result in Bank Charges for Overdraft fees, returned DDs, interest on a credit card acc, overlimit fees or any other charges, then it's just tough luck. The company freely admits the billing mistake and all the others, and promises, and does sort the bill out the 'next time around', in this case, the following month. For other companies this could be 2 months later, or even more, depending on their billing cycle.
I am bewildered that there is not even any semblance of protection for the customer in this.
Am I right about all this? I would appreciate any comments, information anything.
I do intend following this matter up with the National Consumer Agency and would appreciate others contacting them about this also.