Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,759
I know that there are lots of different threads on KBC and lots of different cohorts.
In this thread, I am not interested in discussing whether "variable" meant tracker.
Nor am I interested in whether "prevailing" meant "prevailing at the time the mortgage was drawn down" or "prevailing when the fixed rate ended".
Nor am I interested in whether the flyer should apply to everyone.
These are worthwhile discussions but I am trying to just answer one particular question.
I gather that where a tracker was not in the contract or letter of offer, the above was in some people's handbook.
1) Were they offered a tracker when the fixed rate ended?
2) If so what was the margin i.e. ECB +x%
3) If they were not offered a tracker at the time, were they offered a tracker "retrospectively" as part of the redress scheme?
By comparison
The ptsb contract said "at the end of the fixed rate, you will be offered the then current tracker rate" and ptsb did offer them the then current rates.
The AIB contract said "You will be offered a tracker at the then prevailing rate". But AIB did not offer these borrowers trackers as they no longer did them. Then last year, they admitted that they should have offered people trackers, but, they argue, as the rate would have been much higher than the SVR, the borrowers did not lose out.
Brendan
In this thread, I am not interested in discussing whether "variable" meant tracker.
Nor am I interested in whether "prevailing" meant "prevailing at the time the mortgage was drawn down" or "prevailing when the fixed rate ended".
Nor am I interested in whether the flyer should apply to everyone.
These are worthwhile discussions but I am trying to just answer one particular question.
I gather that where a tracker was not in the contract or letter of offer, the above was in some people's handbook.
1) Were they offered a tracker when the fixed rate ended?
2) If so what was the margin i.e. ECB +x%
3) If they were not offered a tracker at the time, were they offered a tracker "retrospectively" as part of the redress scheme?
By comparison
The ptsb contract said "at the end of the fixed rate, you will be offered the then current tracker rate" and ptsb did offer them the then current rates.
The AIB contract said "You will be offered a tracker at the then prevailing rate". But AIB did not offer these borrowers trackers as they no longer did them. Then last year, they admitted that they should have offered people trackers, but, they argue, as the rate would have been much higher than the SVR, the borrowers did not lose out.
Brendan
Last edited: