not at this time
Good morning
What is the transfer value?
As you are now over 50, it should be possible for you to retire from this plan (i.e. "ARF" or buy an annuity).
Moving to a PRB should always have been an option.
It doesn't sound like the company has covered itself in glory here.
What?!!
As you took ill health early retirement, you can draw down the pension at any time. If that is what you want to do, tell them you want to mature your pension and if they tell you "not at this time" again, you'll report them to The Pensions Authority.
Steven
www.bluewaterfp.ie[/QUOTE]
Thank you Steven, I will contact the company again. I checked my records and the company has said no to my request twice over the last 12 months. As far as I am aware, the plan is a group scheme, should this make a difference?.
thank you, I will contact the company again. as far as I know, the pension plan is a group scheme, does this make a difference?
Hi Paulsm
If you are in a DB plan (which I suspect to be the case from your original post) - whether you can take your pension early, through illness or otherwise, will depend on the rules regarding the early payment of deferred pensions as set out in the Trust Deed & Rules governing the plan. Normally, there is a condition in this rule that the early payment is subject to the consent of the trustees.
The reason why trustees might have said "not at this time" is because if they allowed you to early retire, you would move from being a deferred member to a pensioner member. This is relevant as where a plan winds-up (and is not fully solvent), certain category of members (i.e. pensioners) have a higher ranking when it comes to the distribution of the plan's assets. It follows that by allowing you to "early retire", the trustees would be positively discriminating in your favour - to the possible detriment of other members - and this, they cannot do.
It may be that the solvency of the plan has improved so that the trustees can now facilitate your request (or some other technical reasons may apply) - so that it is possible that your request could be accommodated now. Just thought you should be aware of this before reverting to the trustees/employer.
Just to be clear, if this plan is a DC plan - there is no reason why you can not access your benefits now - and you should have been allowed access to them previously.
None whatsoever. Revenue rules state that if you draw down your pension benefits at any age if you retire due to ill health.
Steven
www.bluewaterfp.ie[/QUOTE]
Hi Steven. I contacted the company today and they confirmed that the plan is a deferred plan. The rules of the deferred plan state that it is at the discretion of the trustees as to whether they allow early retirement. I was hoping that being medically retired would have made a difference. They have however confirmed the transfer value of my plan and that I can transfer to a Personal Retirement Bond. If I did this, could I retire myself using this bond if I were to transfer some or all of this capital into a new private pension plan? Thank you for your help !.
he rules of the deferred plan state that it is at the discretion of the trustees as to whether they allow early retirement. I was hoping that being medically retired would have made a difference.
I am very surprised at this. Taking early retirement from any scheme, defined benefit or defined contribution is wholly at the trustees discretion. In the case of underfunded defined benefit schemes, it is understandable why the don't allow early retirement.
Ill health early retirement is completely different though. I would ask for a copy of the scheme rules (which you are entitled to) to see what the rules are under ill health early retirement.
Steven
www.bluewaterfp.ie[/QUOTE]
Why should someone be entitled to gain preference as a pensioner in payment just because they suffer ill health ?
The main issue here that needs to be rectified in DB schemes is the preference given to pensions in payment. It distorts the whole equality within a scheme and prevents logical resolution of problems such as that faced by the OP.
I am very surprised at this. Taking early retirement from any scheme, defined benefit or defined contribution is wholly at the trustees discretion. In the case of underfunded defined benefit schemes, it is understandable why the don't allow early retirement.
Ill health early retirement is completely different though. I would ask for a copy of the scheme rules (which you are entitled to) to see what the rules are under ill health early retirement.
Steven
www.bluewaterfp.ie[/QUOTE]
Hi Steven. Thank you for replying again. I will do as you suggest and check with the company about the rules re retiring due to ill health, although judging by the other replies I got here, it probably won't make any difference. I am going to also ask the company again about early retirement, in case the solvency of the scheme has improved since my last request but as that was recent, I cannot see any change there either. The only remaining option for me would be a Personal Retirement Bond. I know I will loose out but I may have no choice.
Hi Paulsm
I'm sorry that the trustees can not accommodate your request.
You may need to get advice on your options to help clarify which is the best move for you now.
In particular, whilst you do have immediate access to your funds - via a transfer payment into a PRB - you will need to appreciate that the transfer payment ordinarily represents very poor value compared with the deferred pension. This poor value is exacerbated by the likelihood that the scheme is insolvent (as why else would early payment on an actuarially neutral basis be declined?) in which case the transfer payment will be further reduced to reflect the degree of the plan's insolvency. Was this mentioned to you? The impact of all this being a further reduction in the transfer payment and its relative value.
Of course, the complication arises in that you may feel a far greater need for money now rather than wait for years down the line. No doubt, your health and family status, together with any possible impacts on social welfare entitlements will be relevant also.
Why should someone be entitled to gain preference as a pensioner in payment just because they suffer ill health ?
The main issue here that needs to be rectified in DB schemes is the preference given to pensions in payment. It distorts the whole equality within a scheme and prevents logical resolution of problems such as that faced by the OP.
Hi Paulsm
I empathise with your situation - it must all sound very legalistic. I will try to simply summarise some points which hopefully will help with your deliberations. Whilst most of what is to come may not be exactly what you would have hoped for - I think I may be able to allay one of your concerns.
1. The Revenue Rules can be viewed as primarily setting out maximum benefits and Revenue controls under pension plans generally;
2. The Trust Deed & Rules (TD&Rs) of individual plans set out the precise terms for individual plans and must not exceed the maximum benefits as set out in the Revenue Rules;
3. Under Revenue Rules, you may receive your benefits now;
4. The key terms of relevance to you are therefore the terms of the TD&Rs (and associated relevant pension documentation);
5. There is often confusion regarding what specific rule is to apply in your case. Instinctively, people tend to refer to the specific rule regarding "early retirement" in the TD&R;
6. However, the early retirement rule deals with current employees wishing to immediately transition from being an employee to becoming a pensioner;
7. The relevant rule for you is to be found in the "leaving service section" of the TD&R - and refers to the early payment of a deferred pension;
8. A typical example of the legal style wording of this would be along the lines of: "where a Member is entitled to a deferred pension, the Trustees may at their discretion pay benefits earlier than Normal Retirement with such benefits being reduced as the Trustees decide."
9. I have never seen a Rule (as per 8 above) which did not leave the early payment of a deferred pension at the trustees' discretion - and so the advices you have been getting from the trustees are completely plausible;
10. It is worth remembering that there is a different relationship between you and the employer compared with a current employee and the employer - in that the employer may decide to facilitate an active employee to retire rather than have such an employee remain as part of its headcount with possible sick pay obligations, etc., whether insured or not;
11. In other words, and getting very technical here, the employer in point 10 may be happy to fund the solvency strain caused by the immediate retirement of an active employee but not similarly happy to so do for a former employee;
12. It may sound and, in reality, be harsh - but the same motivation does not exist for the employer in your case - there may be a bit of the "when you're gone, you're gone" mind-set;
13. It summary, therefore, I suspect when you get a copy of the TD&R, it will only serve to confirm what the stated position of the Trustees, all along - i.e. you can not retire now from the plan but you can take a (reduced?) transfer to a PRB;
14. I promised you a little good news! In the same "leaving service rule", you should see a sub-rule which deals with the death of a deferred member during the period of deferment. Typically, this will be along the lines of "In the event of the death of a Deferred Member before Retirement, there shall be payable to the Member's Personal Representatives an amount equal to the actuarial value of the Deferred Pension" - which, in English, ordinarily means that the then transfer value would be payable to your estate - i.e. the deferred pension has not died in the event of your passing between now and age 65.
The fact that you have 27 years pension benefit accrued means that this is a very important decision for you. Your inclination seems to be to take your benefits as soon as possible - which I can understand, notwithstanding my caveats in earlier posts. You need to take professional advice!
Trustees must look after the interests of ALL employees. It might not be in the interests of ALL to let one retire early. That's why there are rules. I suppose if A was a brain surgeon and B was a petrol pump attendant, both under DB schemes, it might be easier for A to retire on ill health, say for example he developed Parkinsons than B. You would not want your brain surgeon to have Parkinsons, but the lad giving our the petrol might be OK. It might read harsh, but hard cases make for bad law!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?