This kind of nonsense is just that - nonsense. I believe in keeping things direct and simple.... I would phone the EA with a very attractive offer on the house and see how long it takes the owner to respond. Then confront the EA face to face...
Sorry I missed this bit - This kind of nonsense is just that - nonsense. I believe in keeping things direct and simple.
So who is responsible then; the nanny state, the disinterested absent homeowner, the EA, some insurance company or the usual favourite "I don't know but someone [else] must be"?I'm sorry Mathepac, I just don't see how it's the OP's mothers responsibility to incur the costs involved. ...
So who is responsible.
No - that's a piece of UK (England and Wales specifically) legislation you (or more likely a search engine) found on the internet which neither answers my question nor helps OP, IMHO.... Hope that answers your question
I agree.I certainly would not pay to have a neighbours tree removed. If it is a small place, you should have little trouble tracing owners. I would also apply more pressure on EA.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?