Is this 4 year rule law or just policy?
It may be the law Mandlebot but that's always subject to a court challenge, which has not happened yet. Presumably the changes in the 2012 Act mentioned above were brought about because of the unfairness where the revenue went back further than 4 years but one owed money but also had unclaimed expenses. I suspect the change in the law was brought about by someone threatening them with court.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?