Always Learning
Registered User
- Messages
- 142
Re-zoning takes place all the time. It's only right that happens as the needs of the local population and society as a whole change considerably over time.That land was never intended to be zoned as mainly residential.
In this instance, the re-zoning to reset it to its original zoning is to keep it in line with the city development plan.Re-zoning takes place all the time. It's only right that happens as the needs of the local population and society as a whole change considerably over time.
The city development plan is designed and agreed by the same councillors who determine zoning, that's not a valid excuse.In this instance, the re-zoning to reset it to its original zoning is to keep it in line with the city development plan.
How is it not a valid 'excuse'?The city development plan is designed and agreed by the same councillors who determine zoning, that's not a valid excuse.
We have a far higher population in Dublin now, and pretending that we can get by without appropriate density increases just won't work, nor will relocating that density to sprawls 10-15km outside the city.
I think the same can be said of open spaces for people living in the higher density city though. We will never again get the chance to add more park land.We have a far higher population in Dublin now, and pretending that we can get by without appropriate density increases just won't work
Who is pretending we can't get by without 'appropriate density increases'?
There is a city development plan, and this land was rezoned appropriately as per that plan.
The same councillors and development plan have supported multiple new developments within DCC bounds - in line with that plan.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?