Beau&Jodie
Registered User
- Messages
- 16
I am aware of the limits for my age. The broker said that the employer could choose to pay any amount into my pension. The example she gave was if I wanted 100% of my wage to go in that this could be done. I am making an assumption now that they would pay my bonus in this manner.Regarding your plan to pay in a large annual bonus on top ….pay attention to the Revenue limits on employee contributions which take into account your age and a capped income for calculation purposes of €115,000.
Not trueThe broker said that the employer could choose to pay any amount into my pension.
Correct - there isn't.I don't believe there is anything stopping you switching your PRSA to any other provider of your choosing.
PRSAs are portable; you can carry your PRSA from job to job or transfer it to another PRSA provider without any charge or penalty.
Well, couldn't you exceed your age related tax relief percentage but you just won't get tax relief on the excess?Not true
I assumed there would be nothing stopping me. I just dont want to come across as painful with a new employer. They gave me some freedom to choose and I made the mistake of taking the easy option and only doing the research now.I don't believe there is anything stopping you switching your PRSA to any other provider of your choosing. Perhaps confirm that with your employer.
If it's less hassle just continue the setup process with Zurich then switch to a lower cost option in a few months? The 10% employer contribution sounds generous so that's a big positive for you.
I can question this but I dont think she provided the information to try and fool me so I may have took up what she said wrong.Not true
If you mean 5% contribution charge (95% allocation rate) and 1% AMC then those charges seem punitive and you could do a lot better. E.g.I am assuming people think paying the fees for the Zurich pension is not very sensible?
Is the age related tax relief not just related to what you pay in? I am saying that they would pay more in for me.Well, couldn't you exceed your age related tax relief percentage but you just won't get tax relief on the excess?
I do, thanks.If you mean 5% contribution charge (95% allocation rate) and 1% AMC then those charges seem punitive and you could do a lot better. E.g.
Probably the best (cheapest) PRSA in the world?
The launch of Royal London Ireland's new pension product in late November 2024 seems to have finally offered customers accessible, lost-cost PRSAs. Through an execution-only broker, it is relatively easy to access a passive fund AMC of 0.55% or significantly lower on larger transfers. Taking...www.askaboutmoney.com
Yes, sorry, I didn't realise that you were focusing on employer contributions.Is the age related tax relief not just related to what you pay in? I am saying that they would pay more in for me.
Is there a % that a company is limited to paying in?
From 1 January 2025, there is an employer limit for contributions to an employee's PRSA. This limit is 100% of the employee's salary. Any contributions above this limit will result in a benefit-in-kind charge to the employee.
100%Is there a % that a company is limited to paying in?
The company can contribute 100% of your salary directly in to your pension fund and none of this will count toward your age related limit on how much of your gross salary you can get tax relief on making pension contributions.In terms of future pension contribution I can probably negotiate wage increases through my pension. Example 10% increase could be split 5% pension and 5% salary.
It might be that they wouldn’t care a bit considering they’re using a payroll company to do their admin on it. It should be no skin off their nose in that case - in fact, I’d prefer my new employee to be happier that I did them a favour that actually cost me zero effort!I just dont want to come across as painful with a new employer. They gave me some freedom to choose and I made the mistake of taking the easy option and only doing the research now.
I think that is the route I will go.In this case would it be a better choice for the OP to ask for wage increases by way of larger employer contributions to their pension?
The OP then has large scope to build up a pension fund and more quickly. Of course this choice is also determined by what their needs are for day to day spending and cost of living outgoings.
If they're allowed to pay 100% of your salary surely that bonus could just be your salary (increase the % they pay in for a period). The reality is that it will be over a year before I need to worry about that.Can you simply ask for your bonus to be paid into a pension?
I thought that would be salary sacrifice and not allowed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?