That is my reading of it as well. You entered into the tenancy on the old basis, so I don't think they can fundamentally change its terms while it is still running its course.That is now my understanding as well. So as a 'large' landlord (ie. owner of 4 properties), I don't need to worry about any of the existing tenancies as the current rules will continue to apply. If one of them ever to decides to leave voluntarily (unlikely for a while), I then need to weigh up whether I begin a new tenancy (which will come with the new 'large' landlord restrictions that will mean I can't ever do a no fault eviction) or take it off the rental market altogether.
I don't think he can do that by statutory instrument as that would be changing the law and only Acts of the Oireachtas can do that.The current rules will continue to apply until 2026 or can the minister apply some of the renter protections by something like a statutory instrument?
You entered into the tenancy on the old basis, so I don't think they can fundamentally change its terms while it is still running its course.
Nothing...they choose to stay for the next 10 years (with 2% rent increases) what will change?
Hi - I own a property in a non RPZ area. Am I correct in thinking I can raise the rent without restrictions anytime before March 1st 2026?
For context, Tenants in the house for 9 years and rent (€700) is 50% below the local market value. Never minded too much as the Tenants were great ... but I don't want to get locked in at a low rate indefinitely going forward.
This thread is for understanding what is proposed. It is not for discussing the merits which can be done in another thread.
How does this differ from the current position?after March 1st 2026 for a large landlord is now by default a tenancy of indefinite duration with the 2% rent increase cap attached?
Again, is that not what we have at present?tenant could stay there for life (40 or 50yrs) and the max the landlord could increase the rent by is 2% every year.
I suspect they won’t. It would discriminate against two landlords with two properties each who get married for example.I suspect they will join up 'connected parties'.
I suspect that they will. These type of rules are extremely common in tax law and company law. Way too easy for a husband and wife with 6 properties to split them 3/3 otherwise. 'Connected party' rules are very common in other legal areas. Likewise if two landlords with two properties get married they automatically become one large landlord; this is simply one of the many consequences of getting married.I suspect they won’t. It would discriminate against two landlords with two properties each who get married for example.
It is awful. Possibly all the small landlords will be classed as large landlords and vice versa because of the glitches in their systems.Also if you’ve never dealt with the RTB you won’t believe how awful their IT system is.
Perhaps.I suspect that they will. These type of rules are extremely common in tax law and company law.
Agreed, it doesn't, but I would still expect these here. The large landlord rule is just too easy to avoid otherwise. We'll have to wait and see.There is already differential treatment of landlords by size in the RTA - what was called the “Tyrellstown Amendment” a few years ago. It doesn’t have any anti-abuse measures.
The sale bit is being removed , not totally clear if it applies both to current and new tenancies though. This is the biggest impact for small LLYou can only evict for cause, e g. default, own use or sale.
- If a tenant vacates voluntarily, any following new tenancy created can have rent set to market rates
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?