Armstrongracer
Registered User
- Messages
- 26
This prudence could well bite me big time if I just pay everyting out thats left in the company account as salary, as all of this surplus will be taxed at the upper income tax rate.
That's simply not an accountant's job, Brendan.Do get tax advice, but if your accountant allowed you to leave money in the company and pay CT on it while not using your tax credits, then I would go to another tax advisor.
I think Brendan is saying it would be remiss of that accountant to not advise the client on building up profit without drawing any salary because the allowances are going unutilised,That's simply not an accountant's job, Brendan.
Is this the advice now, to only contribute to a pension where it saves paying at higher tax rate?Did you pay yourself enough to use up your tax credits and 20% tax bands?
I agree 100% with this. You're paying almost 20% tax to build up a cash pile which is slowly eaten away by inflation anyway and pay for liquidation and another 10% to get the cash out(Entrepreneur relief), albeit you may get 0%(with Retirement relief).I have always argued that all profits should be taken out either via pension contributions or salary as leaving profits in the company means it will be taxed twice.
I was under the impression that cash buildup is now not a qualifying asset for retirement relief?I agree 100% with this. You're paying almost 20% tax to build up a cash pile which is slowly eaten away by inflation anyway and pay for liquidation and another 10% to get the cash out(Entrepreneur relief), albeit you may get 0%(with Retirement relief).
I think availing of Retirement Relief to just get whatever cash is built up in final year before retiring may be a sensible option
It will depend on cash/liquidation costs at that time before making a final decision though.
"Excess working capital" is.I was under the impression that cash buildup is now not a qualifying asset for retirement relief?
Interesting thank you. What typically falls under the ‘excess’ definition then, cash that hadn’t sat there for years or somesuch?"Excess working capital" is.
The OPs rationale for keeping a cash reserve in place to cover periods where there is no work coming in would suggest it's not excess working capital (although Revenue might possibly think differently).
Yes, that would be my understanding. Sometimes it depends on the whims of the Revenue officials though but the OPs logic seems solid enough to at least make a good case for the sum in question to be treated as normal working capital.Interesting thank you. What typically falls under the ‘excess’ definition then, cash that hadn’t sat there for years or somesuch?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?