This sounds like fronting to me and is illegal, where you pretend the 50 yo is the main driver and they're not.A) either in the name of the 50 year old with 17 year old as named driver
Plan is to buy a second car and get a new policy:
The only way to find it is to shop around as widely as possible online and maybe via a couple of brokers. It's impossible to say in the general case given that premiums will depend on the specifics of the situation and these are rarely directly comparable from one policy to another. E.g. two cases with practically identical underwriting criteria but a different address can result in wildly divergent premiums.Is it generally more cost effective in the long run to add a new learner driver as a named driver to a fully licensed driver’s existing insurance policy, or to get a policy directly in the leaner drivers name?
So no longer the main driver of "own car"?but the 50 year old will be the main day to day user of the car
You just need to be cautious with this approach and ensure you are the one doing most of the driving of that car. Otherwise you open yourself up to accusation of fronting which could result in a fraud conviction and cancelled insurance.I would becone main driver of second car/car 2 with learner as named driver
I was in a similar position earlier in the year. You could try a few online providers such as Allianz, Aviva etc.Sounds like I need to go through the process with a few brokers to get a definitive answer.
There was nothing of that nature in my approach if that’s what you’re responding to.You need to be careful about trying to game the system with regard to main and named drivers when, in practice, it's obvious who is the main driver and who is a named/occasional driver. Uberrima fides and all that...
I was referring to this. It sounds potentially dodgy to me.There was nothing of that nature in my approach if that’s what you’re responding to.
You could tinker around with quote applications and compare the cost of insuring in your own name(with your child as a named driver) relative to your child as the main driver (and both you and your husband as the named driver).
Only if you allow yourself to think so.It sounds potentially dodgy to me
My 17 year old recently completed his driving lessons. We were insured with an post, however they suggested we contact Aviva. He got insured for six months, including 12 lessons for 545.
Just on this, had exactly the same setup with Aviva having moved to them when I renewed my own insurance to avail of it and given the wait for driving tests had reason to extend the initial six months. I asked Aviva the cost of adding my learner on as a named driver for the remaining six months of the policy and this was considerably cheaper than the 3 mths top up referenced above. Have since renewed my policy (and still waiting on a test - long story) and the renewal with Aviva was cheaper than other insurers. So it definitely pays to query all possible optionsnce they've completed the 12 lessons you can add another 3 months insurance + 6 lessons for €330
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?