The officer was just doing his job but the fact that he was saying he had the right to take from the old man's house goods to satisfy a debt owed by his son and that the only defence the old man had was to produce receipts for his goods when quite frankly nobody has receipts for goods they have.
No it does not apply here, I think it is brilliant that there is recourse to chase up debtors, I would like to see that here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?