M
I first went on maternity leave Sept 2006 had baby in november then on the day I was due back where was i ?? in hospital as I really sick expecting second baby. Went on sick leave then immediatly into maternity leave then took all the holidays due to me (tons by the way don't forget to add on the bank holidays) then I took parental leave for both kids and then I gave in my notice. Basically I left in sept 2006 but stayed on the books and got bonuses etc until March 2009. So i think the naswer to your question is Yes but get all you can first !!!
I first went on maternity leave Sept 2006 had baby in november then on the day I was due back where was i ?? in hospital as I really sick expecting second baby. Went on sick leave then immediatly into maternity leave then took all the holidays due to me (tons by the way don't forget to add on the bank holidays) then I took parental leave for both kids and then I gave in my notice. Basically I left in sept 2006 but stayed on the books and got bonuses etc until March 2009. So i think the naswer to your question is Yes but get all you can first !!!
I first went on maternity leave Sept 2006 had baby in november then on the day I was due back where was i ?? in hospital as I really sick expecting second baby. Went on sick leave then immediatly into maternity leave then took all the holidays due to me (tons by the way don't forget to add on the bank holidays) then I took parental leave for both kids and then I gave in my notice. Basically I left in sept 2006 but stayed on the books and got bonuses etc until March 2009. So i think the naswer to your question is Yes but get all you can first !!!
While what you did is legal many people would question if it is moral as it could be seen as an abuse of the generosity of your employer. It may also result in a change in policy from your employer, i.e. that they no longer top-up maternity pay.
She doesn't say that they did top up maternity pay, it is unlikely. I have never heard of a firm that pays maternity that does not require a payback for non-return, and certainly not for 2nd maternity leave without returning to work.
I'm willing to bet there was no top up.
She doesn't say that they did top up maternity pay, it is unlikely. I have never heard of a firm that pays maternity that does not require a payback for non-return, and certainly not for 2nd maternity leave without returning to work.
I'm willing to bet there was no top up.
From another post - Minkydog would appear to be a teacher!
From another post - Minkydog would appear to be a teacher!
We are a small private company and we always pay top-up’s. We also offer full pay for any hospital visits/sickness associated with maternity.
If she's a teacher how did she get bonuses?
I always tell my students that the mocks are marked to take away marks but the markers in the LC are marking to give you marks!!
No, we don’t have a claw-back clause and yes, we would pay for a second maternity leave.Do you not have an return to work clause for top-ups though? Would you pay out for a second maternity leave if the employee had not returned to work?
We can’t get skilled people but it’s specialised work.PS, Any jobs going?
I first went on maternity leave Sept 2006 had baby in november then on the day I was due back where was i ?? in hospital as I really sick expecting second baby. Went on sick leave then immediatly into maternity leave then took all the holidays due to me (tons by the way don't forget to add on the bank holidays) then I took parental leave for both kids and then I gave in my notice. Basically I left in sept 2006 but stayed on the books and got bonuses etc until March 2009. So i think the naswer to your question is Yes but get all you can first !!!
Simply being employed by a company does not mean that you are contributing to the generation of their profits. The reason for not abusing lose terms and conditions is that it creates a “them and us” atmosphere in an organisation. Flexibility and understanding from all employees of a company (people in management positions are employees as well) makes for a better business that’s a nicer place to work.Why slate MinkyDog, the company set-up the system for it to be used this way......if the company owners don't use some foresight then it's their tough. BTW, I saw this 'mode of operation' by female employees in a large Irish co. that boasted about how it made 'X million profit per day' not so long ago. Why wouldn't a person take slice of whats available, particularly when their salaries no way reflect the companies profit.
I’m not surprised with attitudes like that.Finally, no need to apply to our company, we don't offer salary while on maternity leave as we don't have the profits to do so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?