Humpty-Dumpty time wasting. What does it mean? Well, it means exactly what the body of the question clarifies: obdurate, irrational, unjustifiable wasting of a person's time. I used the term like a copywriter might to catch the attention of the casual browser. I apologise if this is a breach of etiquette in this forum but obviously the reference is to Humpty Dumpty's style of usage:
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.’
‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master – that’s all.’
Although this particular example sprang from a property dispute the issue can arise in any context where an institution, company or body uses irrational, indefensible tactics to thwart a legitimate claim on a desposit it holds agaist the fulfilment of specified contractual obligations. The Humpty Dumpty reference is relevant here because often the claimant, in this case the tenant, is less powerful than the body, in this case the rental agency, that both controls the deposit and is negotiating with him to concede sums being levied on the grounds of the aforementioned obligations not being met.
The time-wasting issue that might or might not, I don't know, have different legal implications in different jurisdictions based on common law. But I wondered when a body's indefensible actions, of the kind I have described, (especially when the body abandons its claims on the deposit even though there is recourse to independent arbitration services) become actionable. Perhaps never, as one thoughtful member opines.
Perhaps the appropriate and only rememdy for redress is to bill for the wasted time and then to sue if the bill is not met.