Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,768
It would appear so. An alternative to this would be to remove the need for the employer to make any contribution and just leave it to the employee. Or give a tax credit to the employer equivalent to any contributions they make.So they are forcing people to contribute 6% of their salaries. They are forcing employers to match this, so future salary increases will be reduced by this amount.
So in effect, people will be contributing 12% of their income.
This will make it much more difficult for people to buy a home.
Brendan
The govt don't want to house people so I can't see them not wanting people to look after their own housing needs.Could it be that the not buying outright of a home might be part of the Goverment's idea when hatching this whole thing? Neither are they telling us what their own contribution will be.
it appears to be a huge success in the UK since it was itroduced there a few years back, however, concerns surround whether peple are paying enough into the scheme and there is no provision for the self employed.
I wonder will it displace existing pension schemes?
Employees who are existing members of a pension scheme/contract which meets prescribed minimum standards and contribution levels will not be automatically enrolled;
I nearly wept this morning, hearing Regina Doherty on RTE with Rachel English,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?