Thanks Marc - currency risk can work both ways.That would be a really bad idea. Currency risk kills off any interest rate advantage
Sterling has lost over 1%pa vs the USD since 1955
My understanding is you need to be U.K. residentThanks Marc - currency risk can work both ways.
Do you know the answer to my question though?
If that‘s the case I wonder if it‘s a situation that might change going forward?My understanding is you need to be U.K. resident
That would be a really bad idea. Currency risk kills off any interest rate advantage
Who knows? You're into the realm of pure speculation with that question. Wouldn't Brexit make it less rather than more likely?If that‘s the case I wonder if it‘s a situation that might change going forward?
Between my wife and I, we are already in a similar situation (maybe more than 10%). I'm not uncomfortable increasing that.They’re two sides of the same coin! OP can take a calculated risk but it shouldn’t be a large part of retirement income. Don't forget you pay FX fees on the way in and the way out.
I’ll have about 10% of retirement income in sterling and I'm okay with that.
I honestly don't think a punter like you or me can time the market. Just focus on minimising FX fees.We also maintain a Stg. bank account and might be happy to let the payments mount up from time to time until the exchange rate is favourable and then do one occasional conversion when it suits.
I am not sure about whether a UK provider would deal with you.It would be interesting to know with certainty whether any UK annuity providers cater for the euro market. The current differential in my case seems to be c1.5% and on a €500k pot for example, that's €7500 more income pa from the UK annuity market.
Small market with very limited competition which currently generates a lot of profit for the companies operating here, so little or no incentive to be disruptive and take on the effort, cost and risks associated with launching new products. Easier to sit back and let the profits roll in. Barriers to new entrants include high cost of entry/establishment and regulation. The ultimate solution is for the market to genuinely open up at EU level and allow cross border operation, however there is no sign of this happening.Is there any reason why Irish companies don't offer products which seem to be available in most other European countries?
The solution would be for the state to step in and offer fixed term annuities in the form of a State Bond. Very easy to manage with the current state savings infrastructure and would be quite popular, I think.Agree fully with everything Freelance has said above.
Look at it from the perspective of a player with the financial clout required to offer annuities of any sort...
So 5 above is your target market. Then look at the time and cost of designing your product, jumping through all the hoops required to get it authorised and regulated, marketing etc.
- Irish working population - small in global terms
- Subset of 1. above - those that have pensions
- Subset of 2 above - those that have pensions that are not DB or public service
- Subset of 3 above - those that are knowledgeable enough to understand that they might want a fixed-term annuity.
- Subset of 4 above. Those that evaluate an ARF, lifetime annuity and fixed-term annuity and decide they want the fixed-term annuity.
It would still be a regulated product, so the State would have to be regulated to provide it. They would also have to run payroll for all the policyholders, employ staff to run the schemes and provide them with DB pensions. All for a very small market...which means it would probably be subsidised by the tax payer.The solution would be for the state to step in and offer fixed term annuities in the form of a State Bond. Very easy to manage with the current state savings infrastructure and would be quite popular, I think.
Of course, the private institutions would shout "unfair competition" and other ideologues would be jabbering about communism or something, but if we are serious about encouraging people to provide additional pensions, from their own savings, then we should be exploring all avenues.
There is such a thing as too much diversification.I would say that it's often an advantage to spread one's pension investments across a number of currencies, say, USD, CHF, Euro and GBP. A mix of annuities and ARFs would also make sense. ...
The tax free lump sum is already done by the time that an ARF comes into being. Maybe you actually mean having one's pension pot fragmented into multiple individual pension contracts to give flexibility in terms of staggering the drawdown of tax free lump sums and rolling the remainder into an ARF or annuity?Investing in multiple AFRs is also worth examining as the flexibility of drawing down tax free lump sums spread over a number of years while allowing more cash to remain invested in tax sheltered ARFs may suit your requirements better than a single ARF.
I'm not sure fixed term annuities would meet revenues requirements for the investment of pension funds. Are those fixed term annuities for personal investment, rather than for pension benefits?The solution would be for the state to step in and offer fixed term annuities in the form of a State Bond. Very easy to manage with the current state savings infrastructure and would be quite popular, I think.
Of course, the private institutions would shout "unfair competition" and other ideologues would be jabbering about communism or something, but if we are serious about encouraging people to provide additional pensions, from their own savings, then we should be exploring all avenues.
No, I mean investing in a number of ARF type products which are drawn-down in sequence. At the point of initiating the draw-down of an investment, a portion may be taken as a cash lump sum, its my understanding that current tax legislation allows tax free lump sums of up to €200,000 tax free, and up to another €300,000 at 20% tax with an overall cap of €500,000 which is 25% of €2'000,000 maximum tax deductible pension pot. The tax free amounts can be taken over time thereby keeping the funds invested in a product where gains are tax free in comparison to drawing down €500k, paying €60k tax immediately and more tax on the growth of whatever investment the €440k is placed in.There is such a thing as too much diversification.
This sounds like potential overkill to me.
A well diversified investment fund will already be diversified by currency, geographic region, market segment etc.
The tax free lump sum is already done by the time that an ARF comes into being. Maybe you actually mean having one's pension pot fragmented into multiple individual pension contracts to give flexibility in terms of staggering the drawdown of tax free lump sums and rolling the remainder into an ARF or annuity?
Sounds like you have it a bit mixed up there. You can only put funds into an ARF that have come from a pension fund, and that pension fund would have paid the tax-free lump sum. There's no tax advantage to multiple ARFs. However, your strategy would work with multiple PRSAs.No, I mean investing in a number of ARF type products which are drawn-down in sequence. At the point of initiating the draw-down of an investment, a portion may be taken as a cash lump sum, its my understanding that current tax legislation allows tax free lump sums of up to €200,000 tax free, and up to another €300,000 at 20% tax with an overall cap of €500,000 which is 25% of €2'000,000 maximum tax deductible pension pot. The tax free amounts can be taken over time thereby keeping the funds invested in a product where gains are tax free in comparison to drawing down €500k, paying €60k tax immediately and more tax on the growth of whatever investment the €440k is placed in.
You can do effectively the same thing if you "fragment" your pension cover into separate contracts. E.g. I have my main pot split into 4 equal PRSA contracts, along wit separate smaller BOB and RAC contracts accumulated along the way, to provide flexibility with regard to staggering pension drawdown rather than it being an all or nothing once off decision.No, I mean investing in a number of ARF type products which are drawn-down in sequence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?