Hopefully what that means is that when someone sees a proposal they regard as tax evasion and that could get the proposer into hot water with the tax authorities, they tell the proposer and help prevent them getting into trouble.Mathepac, your attitude is a typical Irish reaction to this type of thing. ...
I don't know what schemes or clauses you are alluding to here and I'm not sure what they have to do with OP's question.... When millionaires do similar such as making their wives resident in Italy and use cinderalla clauses to save sh!t loads of money on the advise of their accountants its tax avoidance, but when Joe Soap does something similar to save 3 or 4 grand its tax evasion. ...
OP is not correct as I have already stated by posting ...... If the OP is correct about the 6month rule and no VRT he is dead right to exploit it ...
above. As has been pointed out above and in previous threads here many many times, Revenue have a strict protocol they expect to have observed; any deviation from that protocol is tax evasion.No ...
I have posted my informed honest opinion here, and, as per the posting guidelines have not directed abuse or disrespect at any poster.... - come down of your high horse Mathepac!
Hopefully what that means is that when someone sees a proposal they regard as tax evasion and that could get the proposer into hot water with the tax authorities, they tell the proposer and help prevent them getting into trouble.
I don't know what schemes or clauses you are alluding to here and I'm not sure what they have to do with OP's question.
OP is not correct as I have already stated by posting ...
above. As has been pointed out above and in previous threads here many many times, Revenue have a strict protocol they expect to have observed; any deviation from that protocol is tax evasion.
I have posted my informed honest opinion here, and, as per the posting guidelines have not directed abuse or disrespect at any poster.
I read the thread title carefully and as already stated, I addressed myself to the proposal made by OP - this was an elaboration on the question posed in the thread title.read the title.....does it say avoid or evade ? ...
I never commented on legality or illegality; I gave my opinion that OP's proposal was evasion.... What is illegal about what was proposed, its its illegal its evasion ? ...
If you say so.... Nothing illegal, ...
I don't regard time spent explaining something a poster is having difficulty understanding as time wasted, even something I believe I have clearly explained already. I have no problem trying to provide clarity where there is confusion even if I believe I didn't create the confusion.... just a lot of wasted time.
They've been around the block a few times with this stuff and I believe they have any loop-holes plugged (apparently other than the blatant non-registration of imports)... I heard that it was possible to get around it in some way (a loop hole)...
You and me both.... And yes if i could avoid paying the VRT i would for sure....
I described OP's proposal as "evasion" and stated that was my honestly held opinion. Any conclusions you reach about "illegal" and "planning" are entirely your own.... you mentioned evasion so therefore were putting it forward that what the op was planning to do was illegal.........is that simple enough or will i write it in crayon
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?